From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7012 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2014 20:45:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 6937 invoked by uid 89); 14 Oct 2014 20:45:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 20:45:17 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Xe8y1-00076t-4b from Maciej_Rozycki@mentor.com ; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 13:45:13 -0700 Received: from localhost (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.181.6; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 21:45:11 +0100 Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 20:45:00 -0000 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Joel Brobecker CC: , Rich Fuhler , Richard Sandiford Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ISA bit treatment on the MIPS platform In-Reply-To: <20141006141017.GL6927@adacore.com> Message-ID: References: <20120611182043.GA7597@adacore.com> <20141006141017.GL6927@adacore.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00368.txt.bz2 On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > I'd like to get back to this review, this change is important for > > reliable debugging compressed code, as test results quoted below indicate. > > I am going to need help to get this patch reviewed. I don't think > I'll have the availability to give it the attention it deserves > for at least a week or two :-(. Any takers? Otherwise, I'll keep it > at the top of my gdb-patches list. Thanks; please note that this change relies on http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-09/msg00805.html to have been applied first. Although I can swap the order of the patches I suppose, the dependency is purely syntactical. Also I take back the last-minute update I sent as a follow-up. While there's a loop, the call to `gdbarch_elf_make_msymbol_special_p' will be made only once, even if placed within. This situation just tells me to avoid last-minute updates, sorry about the confusion. Maciej