From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com (mail-wr1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B3973856158 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 23:22:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 3B3973856158 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=embecosm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=embecosm.com Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id k8so9658282wrh.1 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:22:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=embecosm.com; s=google; h=mime-version:user-agent:references:message-id:in-reply-to:subject :cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AmrW/XXjTChbcrmcR+4JEEWw6Oz3KUMdpn0nAe8QegU=; b=ZYSRF7WY/0JPCgnVyo3skK/BtnyjFhTUrA4V3Zjmn80r3TAslLmxblHTDgCtDNwVNk NfHRwvyKpypqP2KAY7/mlw4flUIoA37eHAXAnJoS6obrF9bzgH4Rj5JTnjMcQimae4kL HcyQVxiuu3ii54+r7qJ/f3ozwDpYJ8tXsz+V+M48iHCpL5F10bO++pl59JOdvKlR73I9 7MNkV3w0tVXHjDONarzO0FiWWDruoYUS/7J69k333hSD8H3Au+2JBS0zZ7h4Ks/eHzeA /4PvT7D0wG4Bf6B1Cf3/2rRgGJbwEfd0VL+F9Z9ZWSU0MV4sR4cNYImoTqHw/BjeX6FI PjiQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:references:message-id:in-reply-to:subject :cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=AmrW/XXjTChbcrmcR+4JEEWw6Oz3KUMdpn0nAe8QegU=; b=2FPUD9gvTb45PZikmPczefrhoHAPpzd1Y3uWeOMGTNdPSNdwS0cSnS8vNuvhYUh570 r2IFez63gae+UyOQkxVl7pNRXqzEZ9HLbtNFlgUQVyazLZoo/5Rmwf8OrY61ssErDeN9 8yM0FZ+VaZc+5Tsz4cdGatLyCVObqUUh7DcyqYS+wHEnivkC7SqPE80aSBDe+3upUkwW lfckFDaTfzO/A2JgiwEyM7SW/hvx0vifVDbnVr4Zse86HXDSvlj25djPWeMsUHFeXdn1 8o/Sgwc/GGlIcK6Oy8SJncr/KJz/N3q91SP0/JQ3UllftvUcLlk2SEb1dMZpjgqeqF6d qCQA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3wUCmSWIFJT3SpwDqjOQiOhzWkJVhwQRL40NpFHVFaRBf2D4HO OEepZQ+7lShJAoUN4+kKNPBisR7zISHpXoACtY0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5Rg8GoFdZ5gtKI4R+UhtmnuVOW3u/mKRYOpRshtpBM57veGeejertn5Fqp+8HBb5sHbdByMQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1201:b0:236:61f4:b384 with SMTP id e1-20020a056000120100b0023661f4b384mr8727130wrx.505.1666653728099; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:22:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tpp.orcam.me.uk (tpp.orcam.me.uk. [2001:8b0:154:0:ea6a:64ff:fe24:f2fc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v21-20020a7bcb55000000b003b3365b38f9sm1013984wmj.10.2022.10.24.16.22.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:22:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 00:22:04 +0100 (BST) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Simon Marchi cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: fix gdb.guile/scm-parameter.exp "wrong type argument" test pattern In-Reply-To: <20221024164338.1762303-1-simon.marchi@efficios.com> Message-ID: References: <20221024164338.1762303-1-simon.marchi@efficios.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Mon, 24 Oct 2022, Simon Marchi wrote: > I believe that the first two lines are output by Guile itself, in the > SCM_ASSERT_TYPE macro. I tried on different systems, different Guile > versions (2.0, 2.2 and 3.0) and I always get the former output, never > the output the test expects. I presume the patch below isn't right, as > there is surely some systems that do print the latter output, otherwise > Maciej (the original author) would have noticed it. I presume we'll > need to accept both outputs. But I'd like we if could clarify when we > get which. FTR I'm still looking into it and like you I have hesitated to just paper the issue over by allowing both outputs without first understanding what is really going on here. I cannot rule out a distribution-specific patch causing a discrepancy here, but I feel like tracking it down. NB guile 2.0.13 here, reporting as: guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.13 Packaged by Debian (2.0.13-deb+1-5.4) (and it seems like I have said version consistently throughout my relevant development machines except for different "-deb+..." suffixes). It must have had long distribution maintenance history. Maciej