From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38FD93858D28 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 13:52:45 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 38FD93858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=embecosm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=embecosm.com Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id j15so9954281wrq.3 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 06:52:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=embecosm.com; s=google; h=mime-version:user-agent:references:message-id:in-reply-to:subject :cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=z0ed+5q27w369zoUJ1MiBmxeIxjsgmOyl7+FNr+1RR4=; b=XUlA64fvciZOUL4gujtjU01kMuUNAlU/+HaNxB8jz2+thoSwd6i38yU9sxaZ0lBtzX HEsL/ughtwxmzI7R/spsV9nUi6a+Uya8jaDeiYJreNaopYh++9hPSdUB9xOgjrS8p6C4 UuhRAmhYLRWrgVVrZsr1YN9VnQ0WSRkvzEzoE3z8s9TBhm0KpJaTntKVe2DY82he3eCX OPKK2IvLVnBkl7QJMCRC2P9XQX8wPCbDfKoc/NxkI6cigXM1qz1kTOxxHYAy3Dfs3tr8 9av3nHMAkn4C6tkHymw4g5aGHDL87eeEQzIfreblWUAByff04BZfgmrHrpeJuLVASk5N 3Ewg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:references:message-id:in-reply-to:subject :cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=z0ed+5q27w369zoUJ1MiBmxeIxjsgmOyl7+FNr+1RR4=; b=xTJRfUmvzAPCR3Yh5ju8fTIWsBuszjTzdKLRVYUNn9vKXQLB9vKB866lA0gr2I7GNL vAeal3E+KF4NncI2TZKms8UgFFI9fsmda9j8WLb4tzuVmzmbF3KS3biSNE4bYZnMJw2p BweffDmAsXF5vsdQfY0IYiYmKlemB/AEDxLlU/o5RmqkZlVxJmSgqmRr0eHKbmpo9cfU t6lbUegS2HBFiXt8+LzcJx54YN4QflZkUST78KRAU7r+P8n+T/IEN83yfW76dstwyJAp bC93sOrK+7UN81dCkGVAZK3s9c7nz9Ucx6f7kQg0bgknBJYdTgrvGLYBFOmHV1S8p5Ua 2npw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3crjoQJnUPzHeyNWlcykKX38wfsmER1aoeL7eloDnP/pT4xjCV oOSCQmwlkSJe3d2FU/Aj/oSgFA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7PTJNKjc0t+A1AlLKqDjlfu1NOmqmz4p8hZe8ZmHiNOe1W4ezER+cB2SheALIei2mZlQy6kg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e84f:0:b0:235:d53a:2d7f with SMTP id d15-20020adfe84f000000b00235d53a2d7fmr2485837wrn.334.1667051563524; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 06:52:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tpp.orcam.me.uk (tpp.orcam.me.uk. [2001:8b0:154:0:ea6a:64ff:fe24:f2fc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p16-20020a05600c469000b003b505d26776sm1998136wmo.5.2022.10.29.06.52.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 29 Oct 2022 06:52:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 14:52:40 +0100 (BST) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Luis Machado cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Simon Sobisch , Tom Tromey , Andrew Burgess Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/8] GDB/Python: Use None for `var_zuinteger_unlimited' value set to `unlimited' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Luis, > I'm seeing a number of new failures on armhf Ubuntu 20.04 for both > gdb.python/py-format-address.exp and gdb.python/py-parameter.exp. > > Since this series touched those, I'm wondering if those are known. > > FAIL: gdb.python/py-format-address.exp: symbol_filename=off: > gdb.format_address, result should have an offset > FAIL: gdb.python/py-format-address.exp: symbol_filename=on: > gdb.format_address, result should have an offset > FAIL: gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: test_integer_parameter: > kind=PARAM_UINTEGER: test default value > FAIL: gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: test_integer_parameter: > kind=PARAM_UINTEGER: test default value via gdb.parameter > FAIL: gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: test_integer_parameter: > kind=PARAM_UINTEGER: test set to 0 > FAIL: gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: test_integer_parameter: > kind=PARAM_UINTEGER: test set to 1 > FAIL: gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: test_integer_parameter: > kind=PARAM_UINTEGER: test set to 5 > FAIL: gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: test_integer_parameter: > kind=PARAM_UINTEGER: test value of -1 > FAIL: gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: test_integer_parameter: > kind=PARAM_UINTEGER: test value of -1 via gdb.parameter > FAIL: gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: test_integer_parameter: > kind=PARAM_UINTEGER: test value of -5 via gdb.parameter > FAIL: gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: test_integer_parameter: > kind=PARAM_UINTEGER: test value of 0 via gdb.parameter > FAIL: gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: test_integer_parameter: > kind=PARAM_UINTEGER: test value of 1 > FAIL: gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: test_integer_parameter: > kind=PARAM_UINTEGER: test value of 1 via gdb.parameter > FAIL: gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: test_integer_parameter: > kind=PARAM_UINTEGER: test value of 5 via gdb.parameter > FAIL: gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: test_integer_parameter: > kind=PARAM_UINTEGER: test value of None > FAIL: gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: test_integer_parameter: > kind=PARAM_UINTEGER: test value of None via gdb.parameter > FAIL: gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: test_integer_parameter: > kind=PARAM_UINTEGER: {test set to -1} > FAIL: gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: test_integer_parameter: > kind=PARAM_UINTEGER: {test set to -5} > FAIL: gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: test_integer_parameter: > kind=PARAM_UINTEGER: {test set to None} I haven't gone through all of them in detail, but based on my contents of gdb.log the first three are surely not related. Please post the full gdb.log contents for these failures or run `git bisect' on GDB to track down the likely offender. Maciej