From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E94493858427 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 12:28:48 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org E94493858427 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=embecosm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=embecosm.com Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id ja4-20020a05600c556400b003cf6e77f89cso910746wmb.0 for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 05:28:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=embecosm.com; s=google; h=mime-version:user-agent:references:message-id:in-reply-to:subject :cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vqNsT5GThIhGWH4dC306bvDW/OzEio15IMKIreypZ10=; b=Au6j6OCrh7Fenq9BX7kZVI5g4ABpN94YV+bvoDEZCSK9mgcX80N12BBlpNezAyAeKx 0xX7XNmCGcdIaqhRf8nKFhfOvBgWA4os4tvNwdCjU7fJVcY1RF8uL+Lt8MTCI1uvwljx S32X61fZmvkz310N2sQVkkjPoRjp8LVTEuM42yTCTqUYtLTNSoGGlYqcXM5emJqfHOp/ t52zQ06rBcvDk5BJUs72ggcpbJcNLH1EoOATk8JW+2FIyzU7q0T1sQW94SuLqks6AT+Q XojXGV1/qMIG9Elkk/yraXrE5yKVojypY3AfxIrUVigTLhOjVV6CRk/bNbwUf7dZXu8J oRSw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:references:message-id:in-reply-to:subject :cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=vqNsT5GThIhGWH4dC306bvDW/OzEio15IMKIreypZ10=; b=wGsuaAdpn8rsj7tgL6FHsHqSsU9eRUfxbcQXHk2WuHoGOp6wprqQ91pD9YlCV9GZN1 ORZxci9+7jluUOE3VAyIdMAQjNI3//cx2sEtfUsakcMoPEs8UeKXYKsjCjckSAslVHOM dgCLws8yuvfoZgqEu2SHdFcLlLH291Z/i6amV1LmeIX7+Ogqxe/jpzumApEQg852E/jK oZ3bAgmjFSr8wr0aEV1+W93H6/lfkziy3f9GnptPH+y5Seihkumspe58uxfDzgWy8uX3 m3eCDgLD3wRnlEe33I4Rr52U60G8l92ijjQHeYae99EQ0FbCrFeZ9CWgkL7fZ1jcB6YJ NzNg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3h3+E6UuoSrrPLVSY2tsUN3b/F+yjOabkIDzx/jGr8TF/QWBDI D27GmuQQuIhmWk8a4NHdwGNEBA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4X3oDa2yEW/3Kuj9crt5TjSFEkTcEhUDBhIHOZ5EKrOarjvEFvIPc8LtJDg56YFRT1fNrWIA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4e45:b0:3cf:3e69:9351 with SMTP id e5-20020a05600c4e4500b003cf3e699351mr22260648wmq.2.1667305727745; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 05:28:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.201] ([212.69.42.53]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id az5-20020a05600c600500b003b435c41103sm11467041wmb.0.2022.11.01.05.28.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Nov 2022 05:28:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 12:28:45 +0000 (GMT) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Andrew Burgess cc: Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey , Simon Sobisch Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/8] GDB/Python: Use None for `var_zuinteger_unlimited' value set to `unlimited' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <0cf90df8-6943-212a-b4c5-bd5301b44369@polymtl.ca> <9777b2ab-49db-e203-377f-5f64022421e7@polymtl.ca> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Andrew, On Mon, 31 Oct 2022, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > >> And I do agree that fixing the API once will reduce the long-term costs > > >> for everybody (us and users bumping in the inconsistency and losing > > >> time). So, I am fine with fixing PARAM_ZUINTEGER_UNLIMITED in this > > >> case. > > > > > > Good. Given that you are in favour to making this change and Andrew was > > > against, do you think we need another opinion? Have we reached consensus? > > > > I didn't know Andrew was against, can you point me to that discussion? > > This is why I went into such a lengthy justification for the change. I > didn't want to just sneak the change in given Andrew's previous concern: > . Given Simon's findings upthread, and especially his Github scan, cf.: , do you maintain your objection, or do you think this change might be acceptable after all? Maciej