From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 123224 invoked by alias); 28 May 2015 17:27:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 121525 invoked by uid 89); 28 May 2015 17:27:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: cvs.linux-mips.org Received: from eddie.linux-mips.org (HELO cvs.linux-mips.org) (148.251.95.138) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 May 2015 17:27:27 +0000 Received: (from localhost user: 'macro', uid#1010) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27007621AbbE1R1Wbw9GY (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2015 19:27:22 +0200 Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 17:27:00 -0000 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Doug Evans cc: Jan-Benedict Glaw , gdb-patches Subject: =?ISO-8859-7?Q?Re=3A_=5BBUILDROBOT=5D_error=3A_redefinition_of_typedef_=A1record=5Fline=5Fftype=A2_=28was=3A_=5BPATCH_3=2F6=5D_DWARF_Two_Level_Line_Tables=3A_check=5Fline=5Faddress=29?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20150528092738.GY7864@lug-owl.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LFD 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00691.txt.bz2 On Thu, 28 May 2015, Doug Evans wrote: > > The typedef in buildsym.h has to stay, it's already used elsewhere. > > It's the newly-added one in dwarf2read.c that has to go. Both are > > identical anyway. > > Fixed. Thanks! > The build didn't fail for me so I didn't see this. > I then tried several pure gcc versions (can't trust distro gcc defaults). > I got a failure with 4.3.3 but not with 4.[6-9].x. The version I've been using is 6.0 head, so I guess in the quest for perfection GCC has become strictier since 4.9 here as well. It might be worth trying 5.0, being a proper release rather than WIP. Offhand I can't tell if the complaint was legitimate or not. I suspect it was, even though the redefinition merely repeated the original, but in any case the extra typedef was redundant. Maciej