From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-161803-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 86895 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2019 22:30:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 84902 invoked by uid 89); 5 Dec 2019 22:30:31 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:418
X-HELO: mailsec106.isp.belgacom.be
Received: from mailsec106.isp.belgacom.be (HELO mailsec106.isp.belgacom.be) (195.238.20.102) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 22:30:28 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;  d=skynet.be; i=@skynet.be; q=dns/txt; s=securemail;  t=1575585029; x=1607121029;  h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:   mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;  bh=qJmc+IhFlp2sYJsQKGb0tHqKYGUdzexxcxqyjF4FHwU=;  b=lxgkIKVOwU+Is6aY34Q3liRMlSWa5ZexUV5uUYDkPubIkjkCLfulMFap   cU3vsYzizZ1BlONZNQVtgaqMhfBDwA==;
IronPort-SDR: mABbiUWfNEuRAAELWpjoNAMdT7Ro2sUxnnfrh3VWtd3jJLOosXBEW7knKrucqlCXL3f1587tVu LOOvu3WLFl5vpaZDSWIN9HzWvnG7qty881LogyyZo1HX7ZQY0+zjVt/SHOsjSUg200duKyU8CS X/sfIQ+S0gxVbNGo4or2f9tmc02xZrg6q+rZI5Iq0YRpNGJayLECmrUTa3PYEF33R0W5Pzq+MH A6alloPqUx5GD11Pj92fBreYXgsVrZGlVPA6l/GwptJJ7JkokvDVvIbvgNQh7y9FNz06D+6DvM LgA=
Received: from 136.173-134-109.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO md) ([109.134.173.136])  by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 05 Dec 2019 23:30:26 +0100
Message-ID: <b026af857e9da2aece1a588e92bb5e9aa01bc4cd.camel@skynet.be>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix leaks when pruning inferiors.
From: Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 22:30:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <fca2549c-0600-0cec-a0b3-c7c07e4cc842@redhat.com>
References: <20191201155220.15971-1-philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be>	 <fca2549c-0600-0cec-a0b3-c7c07e4cc842@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2019-12/txt/msg00211.txt.bz2

On Thu, 2019-12-05 at 16:42 +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Please declare ss_next here instead of at the top.
> You can omit the redundant "struct" while at it:
> 
>       inferior *next = ss->next;
>       delete_inferior (ss);
>       ss = next;
> 
> OK with that change.  Thanks!
Pushed after fixing the above,
and the ChangeLog message as suggested by Kevin.

Thanks for the review.

Philippe