From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 59561 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2017 17:50:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 59547 invoked by uid 89); 30 Nov 2017 17:50:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KB_WAM_FROM_NAME_SINGLEWORD,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 17:50:42 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EF4474A2F for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 17:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE3B5D960; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 17:50:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Make '{add-,}symbol-file' not care about the position of command line arguments To: Sergio Durigan Junior References: <20171129214451.14257-1-sergiodj@redhat.com> <20171130133334.13506-1-sergiodj@redhat.com> <48444aaa-b0f4-cf50-8b43-edd1caea4e60@redhat.com> <87r2sf3cge.fsf@redhat.com> <776d2bfd-fc2c-030c-e277-1461360a54a6@redhat.com> <87lgin1x3g.fsf@redhat.com> Cc: GDB Patches From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 17:50:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87lgin1x3g.fsf@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-11/txt/msg00848.txt.bz2 On 11/30/2017 05:43 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > OK, I see what you mean. You obviously know that I copied the same > pattern present at gdb.base/relocate.exp (and many other tests, which > makes me frown a bit when I read "The usual way to test must-ask..."). I didn't know that, no, I've only been reading the patch without looking at the original source. I did say I was ignoring this. ;-) > I'll rewrite my tests to use the suggested way, then. Thanks, Pedro Alves