From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB3A5385DC14 for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 18:40:40 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org AB3A5385DC14 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 04DIeXl9019688 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 13 May 2020 14:40:38 -0400 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 04DIeXl9019688 Received: from [10.0.0.193] (unknown [192.222.164.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42E211F3B2; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:40:33 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: GDBserver ports cleanup To: Joseph Myers Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <0d22aed0-9a24-7369-795d-587ec6b99d11@polymtl.ca> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 14:40:32 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: tl Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Wed, 13 May 2020 18:40:33 +0000 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 18:40:41 -0000 On 2020-05-13 2:36 p.m., Joseph Myers wrote: > On Tue, 12 May 2020, Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches wrote: > >> - tic6x (I don't think it was ever supported upstream. Looking at this [1], there doesn't >> seem to be development since ~2012) > > I've no idea whether Linux on C6x is actively maintained, but the port is > there in arch/c6x/. Oh, my bad, I missed it. I don't propose to remove this one then. Simon