From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC14A3858C52 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 19:16:31 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org EC14A3858C52 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1696965391; bh=DoIEVsrNR6nTDmIZEZPoUVs4arz3PBXPbVMq3akj7dc=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=MRhYoGAcao3mM7ZtslxZSSo5nXtv3pXJ4wBcNf9IUWntSHiYkxfJYYzs3NxG1/3U/ nUcg0c2yXdwXK0nuMyHu0S+0SyTMCmWVmaWS7Aqr8YZqst0WMxACM+ZnqQiXZ0wGZF dOIVVAeao7EJCf+R9ePcTUlAu9uoto0c4vE5DbVA= Received: from [172.16.0.192] (192-222-143-198.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.143.198]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 454761E091; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 15:16:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 15:16:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC] [gdb/build] Require c++17 compiler To: Tom Tromey Cc: Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches , Tom de Vries References: <20231005065449.32643-1-tdevries@suse.de> <87edi9xf0k.fsf@tromey.com> <87lecav0l3.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Language: fr From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: <87lecav0l3.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 10/10/23 13:39, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: > > Tom> However, I do agree with Lancelot that we should do this in GDB 15. > Tom> That is, hold this patch and land it on trunk shortly after the branch > Tom> is made. > > GDB 14 has branched, so I think this would be a good time to switch to > C++17 on trunk. Agreed, go go go! We just need to be mindful when backporting patches from master to gdb-14-branch, that they work with C++11. Simon