From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-f49.google.com (mail-wm1-f49.google.com [209.85.128.49]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E40573858D20 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 13:29:03 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org E40573858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=palves.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org E40573858D20 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=209.85.128.49 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1699968545; cv=none; b=R8Tt+u1YyObSnHD1Qk8b/yGK8bOM6G+nBYM1zrEYMSdsaQ372t4wIUhB9mBy5RfaqmKOJnPalF/CcYY4zuS14HS3L4OcoBefoX1vjysIjGkHiwZxVFeWYeWGIsNEE4XVfVJc27tCMMeL2aEqCuexYWztOAiZgURIs30klOmkLPM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1699968545; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rhxBJDtbmK0MBjR9V85BStimnY5opadXvo94Zv3ju50=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=ntmKLZoBnyx4+ySDzlGZRJma736D7nbFPgaHaAjdrHSZjkFg9g/B8ji0DfQLiZNspELcmPouMHfbHnmIlk4qtoQIlMCVpHE7cIlbkncKnRqSinEgE9JBCB1NkfNg0sxRykwHCvr5tl3UZlwmdEEIZF7t09uAM6zFdlRSh1OaOaE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: by mail-wm1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4079ed65582so44215365e9.1 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 05:29:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1699968543; x=1700573343; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SO4M5XkmLPcLtuLlseQAkb0rF84RkcdaiOB4wpa4SK4=; b=q81w+gE3uc4A0vKdzQ2jmtMAfcFZWdaLEfD3yuwst+edFSymx91E13TH5+E6XXtZCA 5dwBrHf/5U6KxC3zZm84NXTn8a73wEkkm4fUuAD8xWWqHHjrvqmfMkV5JJJ0QTSNveNm KGY+eKfEQewctq8WWDLBMd2yYSzQLVTSC1vak3EY72Nf7402pKNe03X8UvbITevTz8VP yTxmUA+Ikd8K2ua1wSAuJMFherLieAvuq8HLuckMC82jYHwg1OZO2WR5W1Hj1qUuRZpi 5+AJCbO2kDMiAGl3dSZ7oghlf5mBdKK4rnf6IgF0kAUNKypedFQCbMcSQYu7sCsyyEst 9Mpg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxQFrDXl9RVg5GHB8AAyPYI+egBMDd9qRF3Hq47uIt63tQHumvG vhlTnfuZOsFPIodnMloutSmYsL65sIWgWw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGwH+qiXFpLBTcteRTt+lKTPEueYwyQfUPFY9VEl4Fi0pkQdvZ1jD7qjPP84KJOZSo7kSfaiw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:4020:b0:32f:8064:86c0 with SMTP id cp32-20020a056000402000b0032f806486c0mr9974119wrb.12.1699968542593; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 05:29:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:8a0:f91e:1a00:b524:7bcc:766c:ef6f? ([2001:8a0:f91e:1a00:b524:7bcc:766c:ef6f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p1-20020a5d48c1000000b0032fdcbfb093sm7821920wrs.81.2023.11.14.05.29.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Nov 2023 05:29:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 13:28:50 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [FYI/pushed v4 03/25] Step over clone syscall w/ breakpoint, TARGET_WAITKIND_THREAD_CLONED Content-Language: en-US To: Guinevere Larsen , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: Andrew Burgess References: <20231113150427.477431-1-pedro@palves.net> <20231113150427.477431-4-pedro@palves.net> <7c59b388-5ed0-ef55-a9f6-ea35066e15ba@redhat.com> From: Pedro Alves In-Reply-To: <7c59b388-5ed0-ef55-a9f6-ea35066e15ba@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Sorry, hit reply too soon previously, before responding to the rest. On 2023-11-14 12:55, Guinevere Larsen wrote: > > I may be mis-interpreting this part of the test and log, but it seems that we set no breakpoints at all when testing in the buildbot, which seems to be the reason for all the failures. This is what the log says in this part: If we didn't manage to set a syscall catchpoint, then we weren't able to figure out that address of the syscall instruction, and then everything breaks down. Everything past that first failure is just cascading failures. If the "catch syscall" didn't work, there's no point in continuing.