From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18FA83844038 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 14:17:59 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 18FA83844038 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [172.16.0.95] (192-222-181-218.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.181.218]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9588E1E794; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 10:17:57 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] Add sniffer for Cygwin x86_64 core dumps To: Jon Turney , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20200701213225.14144-1-jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk> <20200701213225.14144-5-jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk> <3b447063-417f-b0f2-85bc-2c18f92d08cf@dronecode.org.uk> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 10:17:56 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3b447063-417f-b0f2-85bc-2c18f92d08cf@dronecode.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: tl Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 14:18:00 -0000 On 2020-07-03 9:30 a.m., Jon Turney wrote: > It certainly would be possible to improve this by checking if the ELF file contains a note of type NT_WIN32PSTATUS, but I'm not sure how we might do that here. You have access to the `bfd *`. I'm not familiar with the BFD API, but surely it can give you access to that? Simon