From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8347C3858005 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 09:05:28 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 8347C3858005 Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-519-jDES2oKvNuSWWX8j1FEB0g-1; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 05:05:26 -0400 X-MC-Unique: jDES2oKvNuSWWX8j1FEB0g-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id ay21-20020a05600c1e1500b003b45fd14b53so2391554wmb.1 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 02:05:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=uolLdMpI2+NjkFmxXCxJLNCWcaWC2Vw9FYa8OSThtPU=; b=UJeUeLfdFIVyarc+kdiqoYOnNJRTrX8jM6l7tDRgjUlco85CdO+R5F44ZHxPfqwIrp +QM4WJtwMZQRAvePSHLy9pC47X12YK8o6I+3CwfNpm2621dPo4varEu+TLBg6zYvl/1m X1SIOsJdRTSH4+HQCGQ99i/WdJPA/iQHXii08q11QQv8jXcEFcPzOwF0qdK4ejPPHie8 7Vt4RFak76TwDICesABMpWe4e9+4KUramqKb2G1bRLUS8p1cP2SAuLfPCf7p8HUhIGGw FFcui+LNlTCyjbIXCMXtsdBXYuk1DaH1AmBAGD3YrmXrRGJ/LHAO4LcIwetJToWqk/bP U/vQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3nuCThPNFhPR96Z79HeecZwLrNIY6RQ6zZLJP6xEUuRmJdn3+w Dfq2xrRjF9Vq7laqDGCvwZjPghdQOW4vbnL2z/Jspf8GL5J/+7IvnplJWBUsttTzIXLemI9153t h57gcrm7gw+SGVEeU4qaggg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:64e4:0:b0:22a:4997:c13c with SMTP id g4-20020a5d64e4000000b0022a4997c13cmr1378467wri.621.1663837525027; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 02:05:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5Idu+rbaNwF3rCgVVuAX9IzMqEGtaW2MPY5ysnW+XKiLmk9jlDwYKUAXsbDYmi/1bkZ/isQg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:64e4:0:b0:22a:4997:c13c with SMTP id g4-20020a5d64e4000000b0022a4997c13cmr1378454wri.621.1663837524803; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 02:05:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.45] (ip-213-220-232-121.bb.vodafone.cz. [213.220.232.121]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p8-20020a05600c358800b003b47e8a5d22sm6157635wmq.23.2022.09.22.02.05.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Sep 2022 02:05:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:05:23 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] Clean gdb.base when testing with clang To: Tom Tromey , Bruno Larsen via Gdb-patches References: <20220914131427.269689-1-blarsen@redhat.com> <8735ck4sst.fsf@tromey.com> From: Bruno Larsen In-Reply-To: <8735ck4sst.fsf@tromey.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 09:05:30 -0000 On 21/09/2022 18:05, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Bruno" == Bruno Larsen via Gdb-patches writes: > Bruno> When testing GDB with clang, gdb.base had over 50 more failures than when > Bruno> testing with gcc. Examining the failed tests led to a few clang bugs, a > Bruno> few GDB bugs, and many testsuite assumptions that could be changed. > > Bruno> After this patch series, nothing should be changed for testing with gcc, > Bruno> and testing with clang should only show non-trivial failures for > Bruno> maint.exp and macscp.exp, along with the same GCC failures. > > Thanks. I read through this and it looked good to me. Thanks, pushed! Cheers, Bruno > > The use of __attribute__((used)) gave me some pause but I see it's > already in the test suite, so it seemed harmless to add another use. > > Tom >