From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52200385B835 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 19:26:03 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 52200385B835 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.11] (unknown [192.222.164.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2ED381E581; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 15:26:02 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Better handling of realpath() failure in windows_make_so() on Cygwin To: Jon Turney , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20200116172756.4988-1-jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk> <41beb6ca-c561-2fb2-46cc-98d128f4ca88@dronecode.org.uk> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 15:26:01 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <41beb6ca-c561-2fb2-46cc-98d128f4ca88@dronecode.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 19:26:04 -0000 On 2020-04-09 11:09 a.m., Jon Turney wrote: > On 16/01/2020 17:27, Jon Turney wrote: >> It seems Cygwin's realpath() can fail on certain DLLs (apparently some >> AV software prevent it working on it's DLLs; See [1], [2]). Warn rather >> than stopping with an error if that occurs. > > Ping. > Thanks, this is OK. Simon