From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Cc: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [Regression] Segfault on native-extended-gdbserver + fork
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 17:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be0ac89b-0773-40a6-1946-cc8a7e935ce9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a92a367fa44671fb875fd59528c2bda@polymtl.ca>
On 01/29/2018 05:03 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2018-01-29 11:58, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On 01/29/2018 04:25 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
>>
>>> It's true that it's a bit of a lie to say "[Inferior PID detached]" if there never actually was an inferior for that PID. Since we never print "[Inferior PID detached]" on native in that case, I am fine with removing the call from remote.c. Sergio, that would fix the crash you found I think?
>>
>> A tangent:
>>
>> We should probably change that message from:
>>
>> Â [Inferior PID detached]
>>
>> to something like:
>>
>> Â [Inferior ID (process PID) detached]
>>
>> I.e.:
>> Â [Inferior 24822 detached]
>> vs:
>> Â [Inferior 1 (process 24822) detached]
>>
>> In patch form, something like this:
>>
> Agreed. Though I don't think Sergio's original patch is needed if we instead remove the detach_inferior call in remote.c, so your patch shouldn't be based on his.
Yeah, my patch was a tangent / orthogonal to his regression fix.
It was against master. I was thinking more about the whole
effort to enable "set print inferior-events" on by default
that Sergio is working on in context of:
<https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-01/msg00531.html>
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-29 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-19 16:16 [PATCH v2 1/3] Remove args from target detach Simon Marchi
2018-01-19 16:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] Make linux_nat_detach/thread_db_detach use the inferior parameter Simon Marchi
2018-01-28 6:32 ` [Regression] Segfault on native-extended-gdbserver + fork (was: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] Make linux_nat_detach/thread_db_detach use the inferior parameter) Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-01-28 16:50 ` [Regression] Segfault on native-extended-gdbserver + fork Simon Marchi
2018-01-29 16:01 ` Pedro Alves
2018-01-29 16:25 ` Simon Marchi
2018-01-29 16:58 ` Pedro Alves
2018-01-29 17:04 ` Simon Marchi
2018-01-29 17:31 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2018-01-29 17:36 ` Pedro Alves
2018-01-29 17:24 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-01-29 17:36 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-01-29 17:47 ` Pedro Alves
2018-01-29 18:06 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-01-19 16:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] Pass inferior down to target_detach and to_detach Simon Marchi
2018-01-19 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] Remove args from target detach Pedro Alves
2018-01-19 16:57 ` Simon Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be0ac89b-0773-40a6-1946-cc8a7e935ce9@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
--cc=simon.marchi@ericsson.com \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).