From: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
To: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>, Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix gdb crash due to SIGPIPE when the compile command fails
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:16:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c1d3f353-4714-37b8-aba1-8ff698e26db2@palves.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AS8PR10MB4712E367866076352A810335E4309@AS8PR10MB4712.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
On 2021-06-15 6:14 a.m., Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 6/15/21 1:35 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> One thing I dislike here (and also about scoped_ignore_sigttou), is that the
>> signal disposition is process-wide.
>>
>> If we happen to have multiple threads that need to ignore the signal changing the
>> disposition like that, then they may race.
>>
>> We can fix that by making the ignoring be per-thread instead by using
>> sigprocmask + sigtimedwait.
>>
>> We can also introduce a generic scoped_ignore_signal so that both scoped_ignore_sigttou
>> and scoped_ignore_pipe (and whatever other similar signal we may need to ignore) share
>> the same code.
>>
>> I gave it a quick try. See the 4 patches at the top of the
>> users/palves/scoped_ignore_signal branch.
>>
>> This was something that I've thought before about doing for SIGTTOU to be honest.
>> Seeing it being copied over to SIGPIPE was simply the trigger that made me
>> actually give it a try.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>
> +1
Alright, I posted it here, now with a unit test:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-June/179982.html
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-15 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-02 17:31 Bernd Edlinger
2021-06-02 18:21 ` Tom Tromey
2021-06-02 22:19 ` Christian Biesinger
2021-06-03 5:45 ` Bernd Edlinger
2021-06-04 13:39 ` Tom Tromey
2021-06-05 11:44 ` Bernd Edlinger
2021-06-05 12:04 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-06-05 12:27 ` Bernd Edlinger
2021-06-05 14:04 ` Tom Tromey
2021-06-14 11:41 ` Rainer Orth
2021-06-14 12:57 ` Bernd Edlinger
2021-06-14 12:59 ` Rainer Orth
2021-06-14 14:36 ` Bernd Edlinger
2021-06-14 14:39 ` Rainer Orth
2021-06-14 15:07 ` Tom Tromey
2021-06-15 11:10 ` Rainer Orth
2021-06-14 15:04 ` Tom Tromey
2021-06-14 23:35 ` Pedro Alves
2021-06-15 5:14 ` Bernd Edlinger
2021-06-15 11:16 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c1d3f353-4714-37b8-aba1-8ff698e26db2@palves.net \
--to=pedro@palves.net \
--cc=bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).