On 07.10.2020 13:19, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2020-10-07 12:36 a.m., Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> I prefer to keep all the local static functions in gdbserver citizens of
>> the NetBSD gdbserver.
> 
> I don't understand what this means.
> 

I mean I prefer having functions as members of the class.

>> Long term, shared functionality with the native
>> target will go to gdb/nat and perhaps some functions like
>> elf_64_file_p() could be shared by ELF targets.
> 
> If the goal is sharing them in gdb/nat, it seems to me like it's easier
> to keep it as a free function, that will be easier to share.
> 


OK. I will abandon the idea of adding the freestanding functions to the
target class, unless they interact the class members.

> Simon
>