From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B994A3858D38 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 14:46:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B994A3858D38 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca Received: from [172.16.42.100] (modemcable092.73-163-184.mc.videotron.ca [184.163.73.92]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5ED01E0D3; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 10:46:41 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1667573201; bh=DJ98An2gdddzvPa86uxsJ1oZ/EDo/2TxfIgXiJQ1xzc=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=L7FcvmTX44fi+f4Hs+GpqjtTXnG/t+hoTWvDRgr6aeREWqpokY7OYzgpECxQMYcp1 QK6D7ynFlmY92SkZrkPR2erBXNUlS4qqrjc9YiwCU4puX0xUqptra6202QywnDN6Iz CWrKfsF7z/1cw4K2Xk7lqbkKXt0dRnWiKGU9Lp2Y= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 10:46:40 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.1 Subject: Re: [Mike Frysinger] Re: [PATCH, V3 10/15] gdb: sim: buildsystem changes to accommodate libsframe Content-Language: fr To: "Jose E. Marchesi" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: indu.bhagat@oracle.com, elena.zannoni@oracle.com References: <87y1srrkpy.fsf@oracle.com> From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: <87y1srrkpy.fsf@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > But first things first: how do you people feel about libtoolizing the > rules in gdb/Makefile.in so GDB can handle the in-tree libtool libraries > in a more graceful way? What does "libtoolizing the rules" mean, in practice? Simon