From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 82182 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2017 11:14:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 82172 invoked by uid 89); 16 Oct 2017 11:14:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:sk:23.2017 X-HELO: mail-wm0-f49.google.com Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f49.google.com) (74.125.82.49) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 11:14:57 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id q124so2073981wmb.0 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 04:14:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:references:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zPftM2qQt0ESm7eNOvDaHNn6CZyUgDHrSGNYUaUE2vQ=; b=pjSOs8YgE3ObKytvBwZ67+Dc+2pGMIf7m2prjNYiqImqzWueadlYdOUugJJzaBzlCh e0DCb847dPUjs9lUlHc4VVuWArzglTnV/vVNSPgyeKoC8d1gL6JztB47TAt6VPYgC3zc Tjhlu2a/We5DuYVcZqRr20AiE9rdNIIWiq0/NforkCguULLFpa0i8VhYi0mnPHnL0UpW GngUT0RHwSjdoDW9WEJvisDBqtB1Xwwp6mEGhWV1MGuE0CWlKSUpW+xFyTHUMjy+73Ol bSTOZ5GKvnBjUCxXuyYzWYNvnmrEYYBorcOHki8XklEb2sjVR9IiBOaoG53gN5ldFzcm IEmw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaU9XGSLuywpu26aWW7yAc7kgQpp8OV0aAJrQ7Qtpa7ePeiekjld 8j8kN4v0CsR2Adoa7SmO0OM1xRmxHVk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+RDwVLEupx/YqW/4bKF6zfUJdzpMDQYUt97ligMATzvWcKu6Y9J1MFmWo4fXiUgZUulAINQgQ== X-Received: by 10.223.188.69 with SMTP id a5mr261181wrh.276.1508152495200; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 04:14:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:c7f:ae6a:ed00:4685:ff:fe66:9f4? ([2a02:c7f:ae6a:ed00:4685:ff:fe66:9f4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u52sm14511169wrb.23.2017.10.16.04.14.53 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Oct 2017 04:14:53 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [python] Allow explicit locations in breakpoints. From: Phil Muldoon To: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <04ccc2c4-7827-eedc-d8db-a83a0167acb6@redhat.com> <6b384fb2-4374-bfa9-d91e-88dbdb508427@redhat.com> <3b1153a5-dd48-a0be-22df-cc0dce9da45f@redhat.com> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 11:14:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3b1153a5-dd48-a0be-22df-cc0dce9da45f@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-10/txt/msg00433.txt.bz2 On 02/10/17 16:18, Phil Muldoon wrote: > On 12/09/17 11:03, Phil Muldoon wrote: >> On 23/08/17 14:58, Phil Muldoon wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> This minor patch allows for explicit locations to be specified in the >>> gdb.Breakpoint constructor. It's a minor tweak, and the patch largely >>> consists of tests to make sure the existing explicit locations >>> mechanisms work in Python. >> >> Ping on this. >> > > Ping. > Ping Cheers Phil