From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5FA03858402 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:46:33 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org E5FA03858402 Received: from imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.73]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46FD0222EE; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:46:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.73]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E07D1364E; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:46:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id hsJCChGNJ2GuSQAAGKfGzw (envelope-from ); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:46:09 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC][gdb/doc] Document non-stop attach behaviour From: Tom de Vries To: Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: Pedro Alves References: <20210607132127.GA10588@delia.home> <413e84be-8827-53fb-cd6f-e2ecc66a4af2@polymtl.ca> <5a80535d-f7ae-4707-4df5-5efff08e389d@suse.de> Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 14:46:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5a80535d-f7ae-4707-4df5-5efff08e389d@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:46:45 -0000 On 8/26/21 12:08 PM, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 8/26/21 4:55 AM, Simon Marchi wrote: >> >> I think the behavior could be a bit more user friendly, we could wait >> for all the attached program's threads to have reported their stop >> before showing the prompt. Same with the interrupt (with and without >> "-a") command, we know which threads we expect to become stopped, we >> could wait for them to be stopped before giving back the prompt. That >> would make it easier for scripts: when the attach / interrupt command >> returns, you know the attached / interrupted threads are stopped and can >> be inspected. > > Ack, I can file a PR for that. > Filed PR https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28270. Thanks, - Tom