From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 121863 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2016 14:39:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 121848 invoked by uid 89); 26 Jul 2016 14:39:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 14:39:06 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C2E563E0E; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 14:39:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u6QEd3ek006376; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 10:39:04 -0400 Subject: Re: Wean gdb and sim off private libbfd.h header To: Alan Modra , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20160725082246.GC18978@bubble.grove.modra.org> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 14:39:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160725082246.GC18978@bubble.grove.modra.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-07/txt/msg00348.txt.bz2 On 07/25/2016 09:22 AM, Alan Modra wrote: > bfd_default_set_arch_mach has moved to bfd.h, so there is now no need > to include a header which is supposed to be private to BFD. Tested by > cross-compiling from x86_64-linux, and in the rs6000-tdep.c case by > native powerpc64le-linux gdb build and regression test. I also ran > the sim testsuite, which doesn't do much for rl78 and rx.. > OK to apply? OK for the gdb parts. sim bits look obvious to me too, fwiw. Thanks, Pedro Alves