From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-sender-0.a4lg.com (mail-sender.a4lg.com [153.120.152.154]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 057D23858D35 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2023 03:38:52 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 057D23858D35 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=irq.a4lg.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=irq.a4lg.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail-sender-0.a4lg.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6558D300089; Thu, 5 Jan 2023 03:38:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=irq.a4lg.com; s=2017s01; t=1672889929; bh=taun2TqrPzYXTNTRgkIgTITGwyVJ00QxtG3G7fuOx1A=; h=Message-ID:Date:Mime-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gi1qP9qIBTaREnlyWoCkzNcQcJK6hGRuG2DVOXMECZ3wTNWA1bF0bi6683T7Z4riP HQky1Y5KpNDpgmbuWbhyT+cqSi5UpBxqk3Xz4uzBVvnxhUK3dxwEUJT0NL4gAP1kMo djfDBK0gARqXB28S5JJNhfhR7mmOdeiz1DnFA01w= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 12:38:48 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] sim: Move getopt checking inside SIM_AC_PLATFORM To: Mike Frysinger Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <624505e8cc2a5551bef5de4e7c5fa0a0c21f3875.1672797663.git.research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Tsukasa OI In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 2023/01/04 12:07, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 04 Jan 2023 02:01, Tsukasa OI wrote: >> +dnl Determine whether we have a known getopt prototype in unistd.h >> +dnl to make sure that we have correct getopt declaration on >> +dnl include/getopt.h. > > this comment should note that this logic is kept in sync with other > projects like binutils/configure.ac. > > otherwise lgtm, thanks > -mike Committed with changes you suggested (since the logic hasn't changed, I consider this is a trivial change). Thanks, Tsukasa