public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Vraný" <Jan.Vrany@labware.com>
To: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PING] Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] gdb/python: implement support for sending custom MI async notifications
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 09:20:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7fe4d40879ce414c9ba0f1b1195b2323f2ce603.camel@labware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15611ae6a7d6990f322739bcbf6bd1367b3e751b.camel@labware.com>

Polite ping, 

Thanks! Jan


On Wed, 2023-09-27 at 19:56 +0100, Jan Vrany wrote:
> Polite ping.
> 
> Thanks! Jan
> 
> On Thu, 2023-09-21 at 11:50 +0100, Jan Vrany wrote:
> > Polite ping.
> > 
> > Thanks! Jan
> > 
> > On Wed, 2023-09-13 at 15:38 +0100, Jan Vrany wrote:
> > > I hope I addressed all comments raised by Andrew and Eli
> > > in this version. The main change is added restriction on
> > > NAME parameter and hopefully more clear wording in
> > > documentation.
> > > 
> > > Thanks, Jan
> > > 
> > > Changes since V1:
> > > 
> > > * Moved serialize_mi_result and helpers to py-mi.c as suggested.
> > >   Also, renamed serialize_mi_result to serialize_mi_results
> > >   instead of serialize_mi_data and do not rename serialize_mi_result_1.
> > > 
> > >   The reason for this is that GDB documentation,
> > >   section GDB/MI Output Syntax, describes "result" being single 'variable = value'
> > >   pair and "result-record" and "async-output" contains zero or more of these "result"s,
> > >   so calling top-level serialization function serialize_mi_results seems
> > >   a better name than serialize_mi_data (used in previous version).
> > > 
> > > * Made gdb.notify_mi DATA parameter optional as suggested.
> > > 
> > > * Validate gdb.notify_mi NAME parameter as suggested.
> > > 
> > > * Updated documentation:
> > >   * example formatted as black tool would do it,
> > >   * rephrase some sentences as suggested,
> > >   * document that DATA parameter is optional,
> > >   * document restrictions on NAME parameter and
> > >   * document that users should prefix user-defined notification
> > >     with hyphen to avoid possible conflicts.
> > > 
> > > * Add more tests.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Jan Vrany (2):
> > >   gdb/python: generalize serialize_mi_result()
> > >   gdb/python: implement support for sending custom MI async
> > >     notifications
> > > 
> > >  gdb/NEWS                                  |   3 +
> > >  gdb/doc/python.texi                       |  45 +++++
> > >  gdb/python/py-mi.c                        | 230 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  gdb/python/py-micmd.c                     | 185 +----------------
> > >  gdb/python/python-internal.h              |  18 ++
> > >  gdb/python/python.c                       |   4 +
> > >  gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-mi-notify.exp |  71 +++++++
> > >  7 files changed, 380 insertions(+), 176 deletions(-)
> > >  create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-mi-notify.exp
> > > 
> > 
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2023-10-05  9:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-13 14:38 Jan Vrany
2023-09-13 14:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] gdb/python: generalize serialize_mi_result() Jan Vrany
2023-10-05 13:47   ` Andrew Burgess
2023-09-13 14:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] gdb/python: implement support for sending custom MI async notifications Jan Vrany
2023-09-13 15:11   ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-10-05 14:19   ` Andrew Burgess
2023-10-06 15:11     ` [PATCH v3 0/2] gdb/python: implement support for sending custom MI async Jan Vrany
2023-10-06 15:11       ` [PATCH v3 1/2] gdb/python: generalize serialize_mi_result() Jan Vrany
2023-10-06 15:11       ` [PATCH v3 2/2] gdb/python: implement support for sending custom MI async notifications Jan Vrany
2023-10-09 10:49       ` [PATCH v3 0/2] gdb/python: implement support for sending custom MI async Andrew Burgess
2023-09-21 10:50 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] gdb/python: implement support for sending custom MI async notifications Jan Vraný
2023-09-27 18:56   ` [PING] " Jan Vraný
2023-10-05  9:20     ` Jan Vraný [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c7fe4d40879ce414c9ba0f1b1195b2323f2ce603.camel@labware.com \
    --to=jan.vrany@labware.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).