On 10/23/18 11:05 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 10/23/18 11:04 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
>> On 2018-10-15 3:54 p.m., Tom de Vries wrote:
>>>> Just wondering.  Would it make life easier if we fixed PR 23368, which
>>>> is the reason we have to do the test in an unnatural way?
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> PR 23368 should be fixed now.  Do you plan on updating catch-follow-exec.exp
>> to be written in a more standard way?
> 
> Sure, will do.

How does this look?

Thanks,
- Tom