From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 121107 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2016 22:01:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 121098 invoked by uid 89); 20 Oct 2016 22:01:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 22:01:31 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 002FE935A7; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 22:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9KM1SYx009957; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 18:01:28 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFA v2 15/17] Convert DWARF expr functions to methods To: Tom Tromey References: <1476393012-29987-1-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> <1476393012-29987-16-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> <77fe3ede-66ea-93a3-eb9f-50f9c22a06e4@redhat.com> <87lgxihewg.fsf@tromey.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 22:01:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87lgxihewg.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00631.txt.bz2 On 10/20/2016 10:46 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: > > Pedro> I notice that several of the intro comments to functions that > Pedro> are now methods still talk about CTX. Should they be > Pedro> tweaked? Maybe to "to this context's stack". Or maybe they're clear > Pedro> as is anyway. > > I've updated this patch as appended. LGTM. Thanks, Pedro Alves