From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21401 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2016 18:56:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21388 invoked by uid 89); 5 Sep 2016 18:56:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=201609 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Sep 2016 18:56:47 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29915C01B149; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 18:56:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u85IuiI0010572; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 14:56:45 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arc: New Synopsys ARC port To: Anton Kolesov , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <1472633399-32477-1-git-send-email-Anton.Kolesov@synopsys.com> <806a2777-4ee5-8512-cf3b-d1ac590d72b5@redhat.com> <39A54937CC95F24AA2F794E2D2B66B13581A07C7@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com> Cc: "Francois.Bedard@synopsys.com" From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 18:56:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <39A54937CC95F24AA2F794E2D2B66B13581A07C7@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2 Hi Anton, On 09/01/2016 08:54 PM, Anton Kolesov wrote: >>> Since it is expected that 7.12 will be the last release that supports building >>> GDB with C compiler (https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2016-05/msg00016.html), >>> this patch contain some code that cannot be compiled with older GCC's default >>> -std=gnu89 for C, in particular variables are declared at the first use, >>> rather then at the top of the function. >> >> This has not happened yet, and we still support building with a >> C compiler. So this can't go in as is until that is resolved... > > Will be fixed. Actually, this is now resolved: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2016-09/msg00024.html So given this is all new code, there's no need to try to make it build with a C compiler, if you haven't yet. [I'll reply to the rest of your email later on.] Thanks, Pedro Alves