From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-sender-0.a4lg.com (mail-sender.a4lg.com [153.120.152.154]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1E953858C54 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 11:18:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org C1E953858C54 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail-sender-0.a4lg.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 34C48300089; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 11:18:06 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 20:18:05 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] sim: Update mailing list address Content-Language: en-US To: Simon Marchi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey References: <80bd8d2e1056f04bd1347a9bbcaaf1d0cd847b24.1661566296.git.research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com> <87k06pa755.fsf@tromey.com> <2a97ff52-3938-442a-fd44-6d991a21022e@simark.ca> From: Tsukasa OI In-Reply-To: <2a97ff52-3938-442a-fd44-6d991a21022e@simark.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2022 11:18:11 -0000 On 2022/09/01 23:15, Simon Marchi wrote: > On 9/1/22 03:42, Tsukasa OI via Gdb-patches wrote: >> On 2022/08/31 4:00, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>>>> Tsukasa OI via Gdb-patches writes: >>> >>>> The commit bf1102165389 "* MAINTAINERS: Perform some obvious fixups." >>>> back in 2009 changed the mailing list address gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com >>>> to gdb-patches@sourceware.org. >>> >>>> This commit does the same to sim/MAINTAINERS. >>> >>> Thanks. I think this could go in under the "obvious" rule. >>> >>> Tom >>> >> >> Thanks for letting me know. >> >> But is this mean... can I just wait or do I need to resubmit as [OB >> PATCH]? (in general) >> >> Tsukasa > > Hi, > > Tom meant that the patch was OK to push, and that in his opinion you > could have pushed it directly, since it was obvious. However, you might > not have push access, is that right? > > In any case, I pushed the patch for you. > > Simon > Hello, Thanks, I understand that. Since I don't have a write access to binutils-gdb.git, I needed someone to merge my change (I just started talking about the Write After Approval access to Binutils [which I mainly contribute] so getting write access to GDB will, at minimum, take some time). I appreciate that! Thanks, Tsukasa