From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-71310-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 30066 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2010 14:45:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 30057 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Mar 2010 14:45:26 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-pw0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-pw0-f41.google.com) (209.85.160.41)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:45:21 +0000
Received: by pwi4 with SMTP id 4so4635918pwi.0         for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.207.11 with SMTP id e11mr3160638wfg.66.1269269120091; Mon,  	22 Mar 2010 07:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201003221433.o2MEXt0J031478@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
References: <daef60381003160948q7ba41966o76b6194cd7a8f1d0@mail.gmail.com>  	<4B9FCA21.9020904@vmware.com> <20100316200424.GA29097@caradoc.them.org>  	<daef60381003220702w1198e4ddqaae877ffeec51606@mail.gmail.com>  	<201003221433.o2MEXt0J031478@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:45:00 -0000
Message-ID: <daef60381003220745t69bd2f35kdb6c5c44672ce0c5@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA 3/5] Prec: x86 segment register support: target
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: msnyder@vmware.com, dan@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,  	hjl.tools@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00755.txt.bz2

Agree with you.   But I cannot find how to remove it from this list.  :(

Could you help me with it?

Thanks,
Hui

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 22:33, Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl> wrot=
e:
>> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:02:52 +0800
>>
>> Thanks Michael and Daniel.
>>
>> I make a patch to add base of segments registers to x86-32:
>> (gdb) info reg
>> eax =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00xffffd514 =A0 =A0 -10988
>> ecx =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00x1eda96c5 =A0 =A0 517641925
>> edx =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00x1 =A0 =A01
>> ebx =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00xf7fb1ff4 =A0 =A0 -134537228
>> esp =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00xffffd488 =A0 =A0 0xffffd488
>> ebp =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00xffffd488 =A0 =A0 0xffffd488
>> esi =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00x8048510 =A0 =A0 =A0134513936
>> edi =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00x80483d0 =A0 =A0 =A0134513616
>> eip =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00x8048487 =A0 =A0 =A00x8048487 <main+3>
>> eflags =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0x246 =A0[ PF ZF IF ]
>> cs =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0x23 =A0 35
>> ss =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0x2b =A0 43
>> ds =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0x2b =A0 43
>> es =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0x2b =A0 43
>> fs =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0x0 =A0 =A00
>> gs =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0x63 =A0 99
>> cs_base =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00x0 =A0 =A00
>> ss_base =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00x0 =A0 =A00
>> ds_base =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00x0 =A0 =A00
>> es_base =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00x0 =A0 =A00
>> fs_base =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00x0 =A0 =A00
>> gs_base =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00xf7e528d0 =A0 =A0 -135976752
>>
>> I try it in x86-32 pc and 32bit code in x86-64. =A0It works OK.
>
> Sorry, but I don't think adding these xx_base registers is a good
> idea. =A0They are not acrhitected registers so they don't beling in the
> list of registers.
>