From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783E03945C10 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 11:32:10 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 783E03945C10 Received: from mail-wr1-f69.google.com (mail-wr1-f69.google.com [209.85.221.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-214-MZ_WI2F9PxyLTdq_U3975w-1; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:32:06 -0400 X-MC-Unique: MZ_WI2F9PxyLTdq_U3975w-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 4-20020adf80040000b029010cab735fdeso363595wrk.14 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 04:32:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:cc:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uir/zkVeuuoULrh4xckwf2MwwGRhQ9uHZSxmDSNgRK4=; b=FJkPN1Tq/Pae77vEGxVTYEugW8M2gcHaTAP4HnM1HS6JbGFnZblH0yDXIbhuB5J4Dc UgUS4+8EUN8Wg5+n5jZ4HEVs3tC08q+1O6l8W36f10ohenR4RiXrK6e/TEWeZsFYJQV7 dJaE7CaWcRgPFO+DIhKiA+hQ8RyYGF0kjs3jWb4lO/qaaxzFQ3J3XAkHKqyaJOTt8sNa iZeV4DW58fOyJl1RhyqIbDNOkCCw1nYdMZLbL5whrZU2yq2ND5YaScoKY4M3iHnnliXy UFwHAB1VyChFcnGsY/E4YbgWielBJlkuBK0Fz1q3sEJI4A0ek0HYHfuy01uhVzArNfOM pMVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531/DOKfnrFvBc+HdF9Mg6XJ28vRYXsJvX3wnPGZqYlqmAVucHf8 GdrVlrEM8np1qX675AWLFsEAKlj6NyBYzHiH+KlMGbqmP2rpSBhLC4WfP368AEygsR/mW8qenMe YOkoMTmcj0myQvUCfbF1X1A== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:610c:: with SMTP id v12mr15580503wrt.57.1619436725295; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 04:32:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxfhpOE58bDxio8FTue1vRoZb0zFR9DxkKTZXCMhHRvCtSVuOAASu64rYTBIvIAILB3h0mAcA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:610c:: with SMTP id v12mr15580477wrt.57.1619436725050; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 04:32:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([80.168.237.61]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n124sm4634696wmn.40.2021.04.26.04.32.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Apr 2021 04:32:04 -0700 (PDT) To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Nick Clifton Cc: Binutils Subject: RFC: Changing AC_PROG_CC to AC_PROG_CC_C99 in top level configure Message-ID: Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 12:32:03 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, GIT_PATCH_0, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 11:32:13 -0000 Hi Guys, Given that gcc, gdb and now binutils are all now requiring C99 as a minimum version of C, are there any objections to updating configure.ac to reflect this ? Cheers Nick diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index a721316d07b..59b4194fb24 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -1278,7 +1278,7 @@ else WINDMC_FOR_BUILD="\$(WINDMC)" fi -AC_PROG_CC +AC_PROG_CC_C99 AC_PROG_CXX # We must set the default linker to the linker used by gcc for the correct