From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 403493858D33 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:43:03 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 403493858D33 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=us.ibm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=us.ibm.com Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 30NEla9D005134; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:43:02 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : subject : from : to : cc : date : in-reply-to : references : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=jCqLlJXCfjMYIpKO/TtSl1+N1CyFfPbMIiaXdfe2/jQ=; b=WvgxjE0ylFjjyDXvKwA1JRVUg0eAecg3cbWSyCyhFqX7M+ph1OYFzt2Tp1vuS0eu+kC0 sIvaqL2/4Q4ciTyAPKK4cgjJfNTgdK8/Zq+5PzMCIT4oZe2XcEZraKx0mSdr+jadtTvK o00VtjpsEcZExYzwVBn9jGTJGrry0iIp9k0ncGfkfAM8Le5QVlLrB3SU9BHADfrYW9nY nRm95yVLnZBOGHw/T3ozoVGB2qZtKy/t4EDU+ipP3bUfIbvmlulPlkryLTE2hv29BuYa jmPYnAlxxKMIhPtk2I+wzyDQbpftDam7mqEqk/Stqev+YxQrwEzqKZr4BemWk5wpdOC4 7A== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3n9tb9pwje-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:43:02 +0000 Received: from m0098420.ppops.net (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 30NGVHGL025096; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:43:02 GMT Received: from ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (fd.55.37a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.55.85.253]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3n9tb9pwhy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:43:02 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 30NE0lvH010678; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:43:01 GMT Received: from smtprelay05.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com ([9.208.129.117]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3n87p6wcs3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:43:01 +0000 Received: from smtpav01.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav01.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [10.39.53.228]) by smtprelay05.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 30NGh0EO10945072 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:43:00 GMT Received: from smtpav01.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ACD75805B; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:43:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav01.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879525804B; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:42:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-e362e14c-2378-11b2-a85c-87d605f3c641.ibm.com (unknown [9.163.12.142]) by smtpav01.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:42:59 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 version 3] fix for gdb.reverse/finish-precsave.exp and gdb.reverse/finish-reverse.exp From: Carl Love To: Bruno Larsen , Tom de Vries , Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: cel@us.ibm.com Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 08:42:58 -0800 In-Reply-To: <71aa635593df0677811afb85409aa190bcfa4f6a.camel@us.ibm.com> References: <071f24ecf9b3a2bbbe8fee7db77492eb55c5f3ff.camel@us.ibm.com> <1d9b21914354bef6a290ac30673741e722e11757.camel@de.ibm.com> <3e3c9c40f07ab01c79fe10915e76ffa187c42ad9.camel@us.ibm.com> <122f5d2d3db9ef1979b0f8da927d005f32bba82c.camel@us.ibm.com> <011768e8-2b76-f8ed-1174-fbaa020b15e7@redhat.com> <78b464a1-e32e-c3da-85e4-7bfc322cc29f@redhat.com> <7848e9858b54e33e399b871774ffc0b5058c1736.camel@us.ibm.com> <65d44121-65f7-a212-79ec-07ce53c15ecb@suse.de> <9fe94c0979cb40979b0dea7693a901c2d9f66164.camel@us.ibm.com> <59417813-eb4a-baf8-4e5d-e225d6732f71@suse.de> <7a494157-494f-6adf-d533-bf373b0f054f@redhat.com> <71aa635593df0677811afb85409aa190bcfa4f6a.camel@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-18.el8) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: AN9oVR6LmbR2vFbFIB7zKcBr-jLyXQak X-Proofpoint-GUID: HjyLaCT5W4X4AKdydzglAVF5CGxZUAb3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.930,Hydra:6.0.562,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2023-01-23_11,2023-01-23_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2301230159 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,GIT_PATCH_0,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Bruno, Tom, Ulrich, GDB maintainers: This patch is functionally the same as version 2. It was refreshed to properly apply on the X86 patch. The X86 patch changed the diff locations slightly. I have run the regression tests on my X86 laptop with a 5th generation processor as well as the IBM X86 system, with a pre 5th generation processor and on PowerPC with no regressions. Please let me know if this version of the patch is acceptable. Thanks. Carl --------------------------------------------- PowerPC: fix for gdb.reverse/finish-precsave.exp and gdb.reverse/finish-reverse.exp PR record/29927 - reverse-finish requires two reverse next instructions to reach previous source line PowerPC uses two entry points called the local entry point (LEP) and the global entry point (GEP). Normally the LEP is used when calling a function. However, if the table of contents (TOC) value in register 2 is not valid the GEP is called to setup the TOC before execution continues at the LEP. When executing in reverse, the function finish_backward sets the break point at the alternate entry point (GEP). However if the forward execution enters via the normal entry point (LEP), the reverse execution never sees the break point at the GEP of the function. Reverse execution continues until the next break point is encountered or the end of the recorded log is reached causing gdb to stop at the wrong place. This patch adds a new address to struct execution_control_state to hold the address of the alternate function start address, known as the GEP on PowerPC. The finish_backwards function is updated. If the stopping point is between the two entry points (the LEP and GEP on PowerPC), the stepping range is set to execute back to the alternate entry point (GEP on PowerPC). Otherwise, a breakpoint is inserted at the normal entry point (LEP on PowerPC). Function process_event_stop_test checks uses a stepping range to stop execution in the caller at the first instruction of the source code line. Note, on systems that only support one entry point, the address of the two entry points are the same. Test finish-reverse-next.exp is updated to include tests for the reverse-finish command when the function is entered via the normal entry point (i.e. the LEP) and the alternate entry point (i.e. the GEP). The patch has been tested on X86 and PowerPC with no regressions. --- gdb/infcmd.c | 40 +++++--- gdb/infrun.c | 16 +++- .../gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.c | 39 +++++++- .../gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.exp | 96 ++++++++++++++++--- 4 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/infcmd.c b/gdb/infcmd.c index 5d3221e8b90..63e245f7de9 100644 --- a/gdb/infcmd.c +++ b/gdb/infcmd.c @@ -1722,22 +1722,25 @@ finish_backward (struct finish_command_fsm *sm) sal = find_pc_line (func_addr, 0); frame_info_ptr frame = get_selected_frame (nullptr); + struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (frame); + CORE_ADDR alt_entry_point = sal.pc; + CORE_ADDR entry_point = alt_entry_point; - if (sal.pc != pc) + if (gdbarch_skip_entrypoint_p (gdbarch)) { - struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (frame); - - /* Set a step-resume at the function's entry point. Once that's - hit, we'll do one more step backwards. */ - symtab_and_line sr_sal; - sr_sal.pc = sal.pc; - sr_sal.pspace = get_frame_program_space (frame); - insert_step_resume_breakpoint_at_sal (gdbarch, - sr_sal, null_frame_id); + /* Some architectures, like PowerPC use local and global entry points. + There is only one Entry Point (GEP = LEP) for other architectures. + The GEP is an alternate entry point. The LEP is the normal entry + point. The value of entry_point was initialized to the alternate + entry point (GEP). It will be adjusted if the normal entry point + (LEP) was used. */ + entry_point = gdbarch_skip_entrypoint (gdbarch, entry_point); } - else + + if (alt_entry_point <= pc && pc <= entry_point) { - /* We are exactly at the function entry point. Note that this + /* We are exactly at the function entry point, or between the entry + point on platforms that have two (like PowerPC). Note that this can only happen at frame #0. When setting a step range, need to setup the current_symtab and @@ -1751,8 +1754,17 @@ finish_backward (struct finish_command_fsm *sm) /* Return using a step range so we will keep stepping back to the first instruction in the source code line. */ - tp->control.step_range_start = sal.pc; - tp->control.step_range_end = sal.pc; + tp->control.step_range_start = alt_entry_point; + tp->control.step_range_end = entry_point; + } + else + { + symtab_and_line sr_sal; + /* Set a step-resume at the function's entry point. */ + sr_sal.pc = entry_point; + sr_sal.pspace = get_frame_program_space (frame); + insert_step_resume_breakpoint_at_sal (gdbarch, + sr_sal, null_frame_id); } proceed ((CORE_ADDR) -1, GDB_SIGNAL_DEFAULT); } diff --git a/gdb/infrun.c b/gdb/infrun.c index 183110a049a..a911aec8568 100644 --- a/gdb/infrun.c +++ b/gdb/infrun.c @@ -1868,6 +1868,7 @@ struct execution_control_state struct target_waitstatus ws; int stop_func_filled_in = 0; + CORE_ADDR stop_func_alt_start = 0; CORE_ADDR stop_func_start = 0; CORE_ADDR stop_func_end = 0; const char *stop_func_name = nullptr; @@ -4663,6 +4664,12 @@ fill_in_stop_func (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, &block); ecs->stop_func_name = gsi == nullptr ? nullptr : gsi->print_name (); + /* PowerPC functions have a Local Entry Point and a Global Entry + Point. There is only one Entry Point (GEP = LEP) for other + architectures. Save the alternate entry point address (GEP) for + use later. */ + ecs->stop_func_alt_start = ecs->stop_func_start; + /* The call to find_pc_partial_function, above, will set stop_func_start and stop_func_end to the start and end of the range containing the stop pc. If this range @@ -4679,6 +4686,9 @@ fill_in_stop_func (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, += gdbarch_deprecated_function_start_offset (gdbarch); if (gdbarch_skip_entrypoint_p (gdbarch)) + /* The PowerPC architecture uses two entry points. Stop at the + regular entry point (LEP on PowerPC) initially. Will setup a + breakpoint for the alternate entry point (GEP) later. */ ecs->stop_func_start = gdbarch_skip_entrypoint (gdbarch, ecs->stop_func_start); } @@ -6757,7 +6767,7 @@ process_event_stop_test (struct execution_control_state *ecs) /* Return using a step range so we will keep stepping back to the first instruction in the source code line. */ - tp->control.step_range_start = ecs->stop_func_start; + tp->control.step_range_start = ecs->stop_func_alt_start; tp->control.step_range_end = ecs->stop_func_start; keep_going (ecs); return; @@ -6894,8 +6904,10 @@ process_event_stop_test (struct execution_control_state *ecs) (unless it's the function entry point, in which case keep going back to the call point). */ CORE_ADDR stop_pc = ecs->event_thread->stop_pc (); + if (stop_pc == ecs->event_thread->control.step_range_start - && stop_pc != ecs->stop_func_start + && (stop_pc < ecs->stop_func_alt_start + || stop_pc > ecs->stop_func_start) && execution_direction == EXEC_REVERSE) end_stepping_range (ecs); else diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.c index f90ecbb93cb..0347906961d 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.c +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.c @@ -24,11 +24,37 @@ This test verifies the fix for gdb bugzilla: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29927 -*/ + + PowerPC supports two entry points to a function. The normal entry point + is called the local entry point (LEP). The alternat entry point is called + the global entry point (GEP). The GEP is only used if the table of + contents (TOC) value stored in register r2 needs to be setup prior to + execution starting at the LEP. A function call via a function pointer + will entry via the GEP. A normal function call will enter via the LEP. + + This test has been expanded to include tests to verify the reverse-finish + command works properly if the function is called via the GEP. The original + test only verified the reverse-finish command for a normal call that used + the LEP. */ int function1 (int a, int b) // FUNCTION1 { + /* The assembly code for this function when compiled for PowerPC is as + follows: + + 0000000010000758 : + 10000758: 02 10 40 3c lis r2,4098 <- GEP + 1000075c: 00 7f 42 38 addi r2,r2,32512 + 10000760: a6 02 08 7c mflr r0 <- LEP + 10000764: 10 00 01 f8 std r0,16(r1) + .... + + When the function is called on PowerPC with function1 (a, b) the call + enters at the Local Entry Point (LEP). When the function is called via + a function pointer, the Global Entry Point (GEP) for function1 is used. + The GEP sets up register 2 before reaching the LEP. + */ int ret = 0; ret = a + b; @@ -39,10 +65,19 @@ int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { int a, b; + int (*funp) (int, int) = &function1; + + /* Call function via Local Entry Point (LEP). */ a = 1; b = 5; - function1 (a, b); // CALL FUNCTION + function1 (a, b); // CALL VIA LEP + + /* Call function via Global Entry Point (GEP). */ + a = 10; + b = 50; + + funp (a, b); // CALL VIA GEP return 0; } diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.exp index 63305c109e1..a9c895dfcd4 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.exp @@ -31,6 +31,16 @@ # This test verifies the fix for gdb bugzilla: # https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29927 +# PowerPC supports two entry points to a function. The normal entry point +# is called the local entry point (LEP). The alternat entry point is called +# the global entry point (GEP). A function call via a function pointer +# will entry via the GEP. A normal function call will enter via the LEP. +# +# This test has been expanded to include tests to verify the reverse-finish +# command works properly if the function is called via the GEP. The original +# test only verified the reverse-finish command for a normal call that used +# the LEP. + if ![supports_reverse] { return } @@ -50,30 +60,30 @@ if [supports_process_record] { } -### TEST 1: reverse finish from the entry point instruction in -### function1. +### TEST 1: reverse finish from the entry point instruction (LEP) in +### function1 when called using the normal entry point (LEP). # Set breakpoint at call to function1 in main. -set bp_FUNCTION [gdb_get_line_number "CALL FUNCTION" $srcfile] -gdb_breakpoint $srcfile:$bp_FUNCTION temporary +set bp_LEP_test [gdb_get_line_number "CALL VIA LEP" $srcfile] +gdb_breakpoint $srcfile:$bp_LEP_test temporary # Continue to break point at function1 call in main. gdb_continue_to_breakpoint \ "stopped at function1 entry point instruction to stepi into function" \ - ".*$srcfile:$bp_FUNCTION\r\n.*" + ".*$srcfile:$bp_LEP_test\r\n.*" # stepi until we see "{" indicating we entered function1 -repeat_cmd_until "stepi" "CALL FUNCTION" "{" "stepi into function1 call" +repeat_cmd_until "stepi" "CALL VIA LEP" "{" "stepi into function1 call" -gdb_test "reverse-finish" ".*function1 \\(a, b\\); // CALL FUNCTION.*" \ - "reverse-finish function1 " +gdb_test "reverse-finish" ".*function1 \\(a, b\\); // CALL VIA LEP.*" \ + "reverse-finish function1 LEP call from LEP " # Check to make sure we stopped at the first instruction in the source code # line. It should only take one reverse next command to get to the previous # source line. If GDB stops at the last instruction in the source code line # it will take two reverse next instructions to get to the previous source # line. -gdb_test "reverse-next" ".*b = 5;.*" "reverse next at b = 5, call from function" +gdb_test "reverse-next" ".*b = 5;.*" "reverse next at b = 5, call from LEP" # Clear the recorded log. gdb_test "record stop" "Process record is stopped.*" \ @@ -84,21 +94,81 @@ gdb_test_no_output "record" "turn on process record for test2" ### TEST 2: reverse finish from the body of function1. # Set breakpoint at call to function1 in main. -gdb_breakpoint $srcfile:$bp_FUNCTION temporary +gdb_breakpoint $srcfile:$bp_LEP_test temporary # Continue to break point at function1 call in main. gdb_continue_to_breakpoint \ "at function1 entry point instruction to step to body of function" \ - ".*$srcfile:$bp_FUNCTION\r\n.*" + ".*$srcfile:$bp_LEP_test\r\n.*" # do a step instruction to get to the body of the function gdb_test "step" ".*int ret = 0;.*" "step test 1" -gdb_test "reverse-finish" ".*function1 \\(a, b\\); // CALL FUNCTION.*" \ - "reverse-finish function1 call from function body" +gdb_test "reverse-finish" ".*function1 \\(a, b\\); // CALL VIA LEP.*" \ + "reverse-finish function1 LEP call from function body" # Check to make sure we stopped at the first instruction in the source code # line. It should only take one reverse next command to get to the previous # source line. gdb_test "reverse-next" ".*b = 5;.*" \ "reverse next at b = 5, from function body" + +# Turn off record to clear logs and turn on again +gdb_test "record stop" "Process record is stopped.*" \ + "turn off process record for test2" +gdb_test_no_output "record" "turn on process record for test3" + + +### TEST 3: reverse finish from the alternate entry point instruction (GEP) in +### function1 when called using the alternate entry point (GEP). + +# Set breakpoint at call to funp in main. +set bp_GEP_test [gdb_get_line_number "CALL VIA GEP" $srcfile] +gdb_breakpoint $srcfile:$bp_GEP_test temporary + +# Continue to break point at funp call in main. +gdb_continue_to_breakpoint \ + "stopped at function1 entry point instruction to stepi into funp" \ + ".*$srcfile:$bp_GEP_test\r\n.*" + +# stepi until we see "{" indicating we entered function. +repeat_cmd_until "stepi" "CALL VIA GEP" "{" "stepi into funp call" + +gdb_test "reverse-finish" ".*funp \\(a, b\\);.*" \ + "function1 GEP call call from GEP" + +# Check to make sure we stopped at the first instruction in the source code +# line. It should only take one reverse next command to get to the previous +# source line. If GDB stops at the last instruction in the source code line +# it will take two reverse next instructions to get to the previous source +# line. +gdb_test "reverse-next" ".*b = 50;.*" "reverse next at b = 50, call from GEP" + +# Turn off record to clear logs and turn on again +gdb_test "record stop" "Process record is stopped.*" \ + "turn off process record for test3" +gdb_test_no_output "record" "turn on process record for test4" + + +### TEST 4: reverse finish from the body of function 1 when calling using the +### alternate entrypoint (GEP). +gdb_breakpoint $srcfile:$bp_GEP_test temporary + +# Continue to break point at funp call. +gdb_continue_to_breakpoint \ + "at function1 entry point instruction to step to body of funp call" \ + ".*$srcfile:$bp_GEP_test\r\n.*" + +# Step into body of funp, called via GEP. +gdb_test "step" ".*int ret = 0;.*" "step test 2" + +gdb_test "reverse-finish" ".*funp \\(a, b\\);.*" \ + "reverse-finish function1 GEP call, from function body " + +# Check to make sure we stopped at the first instruction in the source code +# line. It should only take one reverse next command to get to the previous +# source line. If GDB stops at the last instruction in the source code line +# it will take two reverse next instructions to get to the previous source +# line. +gdb_test "reverse-next" ".*b = 50;.*" \ + "reverse next at b = 50 from function body" -- 2.37.2