From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 115305 invoked by alias); 18 May 2016 14:54:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 115293 invoked by uid 89); 18 May 2016 14:54:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 18 May 2016 14:54:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FF1E7209D; Wed, 18 May 2016 14:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u4IEsQa5032413; Wed, 18 May 2016 10:54:27 -0400 Subject: Re: [PING 2][PATCH][PR gdb/19893] Fix handling of synthetic C++ references To: Martin Galvan , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, daniel.gutson@tallertechnologies.com References: <2918b01b-cb93-bda1-df66-96d3aba983ad@redhat.com> <1463582858-11127-1-git-send-email-martin.galvan@tallertechnologies.com> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 14:54:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1463582858-11127-1-git-send-email-martin.galvan@tallertechnologies.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg00303.txt.bz2 On 05/18/2016 03:47 PM, Martin Galvan wrote: > Odd. Just re-generated the patch against master; see if this works. Works now. /me looks at patch. Thanks, Pedro Alves