From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1c]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 124C0385703F for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 13:30:49 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 124C0385703F Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 124C0385703F Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2001:67c:2178:6::1c ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1699363850; cv=none; b=G3KTJZiN3KpE2AId4UQJyhJf5oxBUFBAkR+26+aSAsB+kzsGDxD/rjayZdVYFv44WiypSNBtuV4BPdPaP/rilFdNjGEbYkQiJIcA/21XlenNKzHCgU8LbfQXUQWjTdgrxU7FiXriXeeFVtqGYA0lCH2XW+iq179O+8nERmGIyfg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1699363850; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kMfnOTgHVkWi10d2cF5nvgHpIvZH+2A499L6ScF41oM=; h=DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Subject:To:From; b=U/sbKtAVxeGfRnR1JW7X2Ar7tuTSKJ2DlfA+iX+xuJ+66GHC+eJ40pB+44IAGUe7lM0b5BQ/IAXZdk8oOSROEdKXu3tpuHoAo12PGbTbJJGmOxBaKWA9AWeXMiCyT9s9rL0tncdowGafMYAWrNklaaekwpO7fOxWNwoShT9nUrA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4143721901; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 13:30:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1699363848; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xvrXofAVTRWi+nkccBJ32hEpxaYelQA3SbUSSlHHtgE=; b=AFIk2FrUG+d9vpjmivfXSWPlMTeiO9QGCDt65dfFOgGoA1TcjBeml8OUn4Xsp3ce7YOlpz Fy39A7a0v11GwQlRqDkT8s51BAcaMxAuu6IsdCtwJrL5e4m9umoNscc41cR3wU/sn0VaiY 9Ou2vx7IpgRYPy4hRpfbbECduDDWwSw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1699363848; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xvrXofAVTRWi+nkccBJ32hEpxaYelQA3SbUSSlHHtgE=; b=bnp0C4jHWf/kfP7dg8VCg9U+2weqIR6FqKJ30ERfQ1Mw4AhTWGqrPIXU5ryPibYmHj3sHP 5PxvT2IFZFZA4xDA== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EFC513907; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 13:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id YiZQCgg8SmVfYwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 07 Nov 2023 13:30:48 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 14:32:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [gdb] Fix segfault in for_each_block, part 1 Content-Language: en-US To: Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20231104155757.16649-1-tdevries@suse.de> <20231104155757.16649-2-tdevries@suse.de> <3040273d-76d9-43a3-a9a6-5b7225276cc6@simark.ca> From: Tom de Vries In-Reply-To: <3040273d-76d9-43a3-a9a6-5b7225276cc6@simark.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 11/6/23 18:05, Simon Marchi wrote: > Implementation question: is there any reason you didn't choose > std::shared_ptr? For objects that are new'ed / delete'd, that seems like > a good choice. No particular reason other than that I'm unfamiliar with std::shared_ptr. In the v2 ( https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2023-November/203850.html ) I've used std::shared_ptr. Thanks, - Tom