public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: thiago.bauermann@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/16] [gdb/generic] corefile/bug: Fixup (gcore) core file target description reading order
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 12:10:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e92eb90c-56e4-966e-19e9-e55c688893b7@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230907152018.1031257-14-luis.machado@arm.com>

Could a global maintainer please go through this change and let me know if it is OK? It touches a generic part of gdb as well.

This has the potential to cause some issues for some targets relying on the gdb xml core file note.

On 9/7/23 16:20, Luis Machado via Gdb-patches wrote:
> Due to the nature of the AArch64 SVE/SME extensions in GDB, each thread
> can potentially have distinct target descriptions/gdbarches.
> 
> When loading a gcore-generated core file, at the moment GDB gives priority
> to the target description dumped to NT_GDB_TDESC.  Though technically correct
> for most target, it doesn't work correctly for AArch64 with SVE or SME
> support.
> 
> The correct approach for AArch64/Linux is to rely on the
> gdbarch_core_read_description hook, so it can figure out the proper target
> description for a given thread based on the various available register notes.
> 
> I think this should work for other architectures as well. If not, we may
> need to adjust things so all architectures get the information that they
> need for discovering the target description of the core file.
> 
> Regression-tested on aarch64-linux Ubuntu 22.04/20.04.
> ---
>  gdb/corelow.c | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/corelow.c b/gdb/corelow.c
> index 439270f5559..ae1641fe5d2 100644
> --- a/gdb/corelow.c
> +++ b/gdb/corelow.c
> @@ -1229,6 +1229,21 @@ core_target::thread_alive (ptid_t ptid)
>  const struct target_desc *
>  core_target::read_description ()
>  {
> +  /* If the architecture provides a corefile target description hook, use
> +     it now.  Even if the core file contains a target description in a note
> +     section, it is not useful for targets that can potentially have distinct
> +     descriptions for each thread.  One example is AArch64's SVE/SME
> +     extensions that allow per-thread vector length changes, resulting in
> +     registers with different sizes.  */
> +  if (m_core_gdbarch && gdbarch_core_read_description_p (m_core_gdbarch))
> +    {
> +      const struct target_desc *result;
> +
> +      result = gdbarch_core_read_description (m_core_gdbarch, this, core_bfd);
> +      if (result != nullptr)
> +	return result;
> +    }
> +
>    /* If the core file contains a target description note then we will use
>       that in preference to anything else.  */
>    bfd_size_type tdesc_note_size = 0;
> @@ -1252,15 +1267,6 @@ core_target::read_description ()
>  	}
>      }
>  
> -  if (m_core_gdbarch && gdbarch_core_read_description_p (m_core_gdbarch))
> -    {
> -      const struct target_desc *result;
> -
> -      result = gdbarch_core_read_description (m_core_gdbarch, this, core_bfd);
> -      if (result != NULL)
> -	return result;
> -    }
> -
>    return this->beneath ()->read_description ();
>  }
>  


  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-08 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-07 15:20 [PATCH v5 00/16] SME support for AArch64 gdb/gdbserver on Linux Luis Machado
2023-09-07 15:20 ` [PATCH v5 01/16] [gdb/aarch64] Fix register fetch/store order for native AArch64 Linux Luis Machado
2023-09-07 15:20 ` [PATCH v5 02/16] [gdb/aarch64] refactor: Rename SVE-specific files Luis Machado
2023-09-07 15:20 ` [PATCH v5 03/16] [gdb/gdbserver] refactor: Simplify SVE interface to read/write registers Luis Machado
2023-09-07 15:20 ` [PATCH v5 04/16] [gdb/aarch64] sve: Fix return command when using V registers in a SVE-enabled target Luis Machado
2023-09-07 15:20 ` [PATCH v5 05/16] [gdb/aarch64] sme: Enable SME registers and pseudo-registers Luis Machado
2023-09-07 15:20 ` [PATCH v5 06/16] [gdbserver/aarch64] refactor: Adjust expedited registers dynamically Luis Machado
2023-09-08 15:35   ` Simon Marchi
2023-09-08 16:00     ` Luis Machado
2023-09-08 16:52       ` Simon Marchi
2023-09-07 15:20 ` [PATCH v5 07/16] [gdbserver/aarch64] sme: Add support for SME Luis Machado
2023-09-07 15:20 ` [PATCH v5 08/16] [gdb/aarch64] sve: Fix signal frame z/v register restore Luis Machado
2023-09-07 15:20 ` [PATCH v5 09/16] [gdb/aarch64] sme: Signal frame support Luis Machado
2023-09-07 15:20 ` [PATCH v5 10/16] [gdb/aarch64] sme: Fixup sigframe gdbarch when vg/svg changes Luis Machado
2023-09-08 11:08   ` Luis Machado
2023-09-08 15:48     ` Simon Marchi
2023-09-08 15:51       ` Simon Marchi
2023-09-08 15:51       ` Luis Machado
2023-09-08 15:59         ` Simon Marchi
2023-09-07 15:20 ` [PATCH v5 11/16] [gdb/aarch64] sme: Support TPIDR2 signal frame context Luis Machado
2023-09-07 15:20 ` [PATCH v5 12/16] [gdb/generic] corefile/bug: Use thread-specific gdbarch when dumping register state to core files Luis Machado
2023-09-08 11:09   ` Luis Machado
2023-09-08 15:58     ` Simon Marchi
2023-09-08 16:02       ` Simon Marchi
2023-09-08 16:05       ` Luis Machado
2023-09-07 15:20 ` [PATCH v5 13/16] [gdb/generic] corefile/bug: Fixup (gcore) core file target description reading order Luis Machado
2023-09-08 11:10   ` Luis Machado [this message]
2023-09-08 17:10   ` Simon Marchi
2023-09-12  8:49     ` Luis Machado
2023-09-13 13:50       ` Simon Marchi
2023-09-13 13:57         ` Luis Machado
2023-09-07 15:20 ` [PATCH v5 14/16] [gdb/aarch64] sme: Core file support for Linux Luis Machado
2023-09-07 15:20 ` [PATCH v5 15/16] [gdb/testsuite] sme: Add SVE/SME testcases Luis Machado
2023-09-07 15:20 ` [PATCH v5 16/16] [gdb/docs] sme: Document SME registers and features Luis Machado
2023-09-13  3:03 ` [PATCH v5 00/16] SME support for AArch64 gdb/gdbserver on Linux Thiago Jung Bauermann
2023-09-13 10:20   ` Luis Machado

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e92eb90c-56e4-966e-19e9-e55c688893b7@arm.com \
    --to=luis.machado@arm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).