From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1909A3853545 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 14:50:46 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1909A3853545 Received: from [10.9.7.166] (vpn-konference.ms.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.20.101]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3FFA71E0D3; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:50:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:50:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.0 Subject: Re: [RFC][gdb] Handle pending ^C after rl_callback_read_char To: Tom de Vries , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20220913125619.GA15500@delia.home> <9c5a599c-faf3-940b-745b-3528cd72fcdb@simark.ca> <30fdc4c1-b19e-d850-6fb1-2ebc811de1db@suse.de> Content-Language: fr From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: <30fdc4c1-b19e-d850-6fb1-2ebc811de1db@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 14:50:48 -0000 On 9/16/22 10:28, Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches wrote: > On 9/13/22 16:32, Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches wrote: >> Ack, I'll wait a bit for more comments, and then commit.  Then we can refer to current gdb source code when posing the question about readline. > > I've committed, and send an email to bug-readline.  I don't see it yet in the archives. > > Thanks, > - Tom Here it is: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-readline/2022-09/msg00001.html Thanks for following up. Simon