From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk1-x72e.google.com (mail-qk1-x72e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40E063858D34 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:36:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 40E063858D34 Received: by mail-qk1-x72e.google.com with SMTP id e13so8405808qkg.5 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 04:36:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/VObkvg3cmo0dPnMzTbrkj68pion6ZpTFW3au2aYM8w=; b=bh5AxXdJkn3REqKsOJ3vgThny1FZ7tcTIkKP/ASB7BYHPWaLPPxWl1TQTvsZgEVex3 ZBs6aylfqdbEIybp99sKCnkXCq+enARVg2nelDsZDXdZgMm03U43C9HWbHMf/L6PASVW EMMm4q9HOOksq1M50XzkDHz227OulZCjF+wnht56pgQ4M/Vszh0Ggch5CQHJbPZ17XSc E0jkA6vswgsN1+98Ea0bInaqtbsiDidpEg11fAuG5ds2nUBNU3q6Z3fiHSdkYGirDQJD ZJqOiHMH4I+ayzssfAFaTYrQINtBuj3wbFpQWOyK+eqilQIVz1psFdvauoPWtlSE3xLE Nd+A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531FB0K2sa+tA3EstAofpiLmHn7hApM+HYijx7S7qetmuEHb08Na lhk8hgs9/4mFLVjb/C+6HvxKkfeSkSTPBA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyU1U2MRJj/gYrqwy7an0HMzwB4bKHE1LNL7EZPdLQzweiBvtf49M7MViofVI6nR4x4GsgMig== X-Received: by 2002:a37:8fc5:: with SMTP id r188mr2010836qkd.447.1593171400819; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 04:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.185] ([191.34.154.80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s52sm9351416qtj.52.2020.06.26.04.36.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 26 Jun 2020 04:36:39 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: GDB 10.1 release: branching early July? To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: tom@tromey.com References: <20200614015612.GA6242@adacore.com> From: Luis Machado Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 08:36:36 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200614015612.GA6242@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:36:42 -0000 On 6/13/20 10:56 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Now that the GDB 9.2 release has been out for a few weeks, what > do you think about turning our attention to starting the GDB 10 > release cycle? I looked at the NEWS file, and there is a decent > number of new features. > > Based on that, what do you think of aiming for branching during > the weekend of July 4th? That's 3 weeks from now. We would then > be creating the first pre-release at the same time if possible, > and then try to aim for a release 2-3 weeks afterwards. > > Are there any changes that you think we should have in master > before we create the branch? > > This is what is current in the 10.1 list on Bugzilla: > > * [unassigned] > thread_info with duplicate ptid added to inferior thread list > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25412 > > Reported by Simon, who started investigating a bit. > Simon says the issue appeared after the "multi-target" patch > series went in (5b6d1e4fa by Pedro). > > Simon - is that still an issue? > > * [RainerO] > [10 regression] run fails with ICE on Solaris > > Not sure if this is still an issue or not. Rainer did push some > patches to master back in May. To be confirmed. > > I also know of the following issue which I think should get fixed > before we branch: > > * [AndrewB/TomT] > QEMU / GDB compatibility on RISCV64 ELF (failure to fetch some registers) > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-June/169393.html > > Anything else you think we should include? I just reported one for 10.1, so we can make sure that is fixed before branch/release. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26175