From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gdb tests: Allow for "LWP" in thread IDs from info threads.
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 13:56:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f29bb557-8e51-2bda-022f-08087af92458@FreeBSD.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10ba4b3e-19e0-2889-47de-67667db21af1@simark.ca>
On 5/9/23 12:01 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 4/18/23 16:13, John Baldwin wrote:
>> Several tests assume that the first word after a thread ID in 'info
>> threads' output is "Thread". However, several targets use "LWP"
>> instead such as the FreeBSD and NetBSD native targets. The Linux
>> native target also uses "LWP" if libthread_db is not being used.
>>
>> Add a tdlabel_re global variable as a regular-expression for a thread
>> label in `info threads' that matches either "thread" or "LWP".
>>
>> Some other tests in the tree don't require a specific word, and
>> some targets may use other first words (e.g. OpenBSD uses "thread"
>> and Ravenscar threads use "Ravenscar Thread").
>
> That LGTM, I don't really see another way:
>
> Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
>
> One nit is that I prefer to use the ${::tdlabel_re} notation instead of
> the global keyword, but it's not a dealbreaker.
>
> And just one question:
>
>> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.trace/report.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.trace/report.exp
>> index 14db2511d40..a5b7ccf4ba5 100644
>> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.trace/report.exp
>> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.trace/report.exp
>> @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ proc use_collected_data { data_source } {
>>
>> # There is always a thread of an inferior, either a live one or
>> # a faked one.
>> - gdb_test "info threads" "\\* ${decimal} (process|Thread) \[0-9\.\]+\[ \t\].*"
>> + gdb_test "info threads" "\\* ${decimal} ${tdlabel_re} \[0-9\.\]+\[ \t\].*"
>
> This one said "process" as well, I guess it's not important?
Hummm, it didn't regress on Linux, but on some other native target that
doesn't support threads it might regress I guess. normal_pid_to_str
uses "process <PID>" and is the defalt for target::pid_to_str.
Probably tdlabel_re should permit "process" as a word as well:
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
index 527c84599ca..6ded65e31c4 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ set inferior_exited_re "(?:\\\[Inferior \[0-9\]+ \\(\[^\n\r\]*\\) exited)"
# A regular expression that matches the first word of a thread
# description after the thread number info 'info threads'
-set tdlabel_re "(Thread|LWP)"
+set tdlabel_re "(process|Thread|LWP)"
# A regular expression that matches a value history number.
# E.g., $1, $2, etc.
(I'd also have to reword the commit log a bit to mention this case if so.)
--
John Baldwin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-09 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-18 20:13 John Baldwin
2023-05-08 16:19 ` [PING] " John Baldwin
2023-05-09 19:01 ` Simon Marchi
2023-05-09 20:56 ` John Baldwin [this message]
2023-05-12 14:15 ` John Baldwin
2023-05-26 17:51 ` John Baldwin
2023-06-09 16:56 ` John Baldwin
2023-06-30 14:21 ` [PING] " John Baldwin
2023-07-14 15:35 ` John Baldwin
2024-03-22 20:58 ` John Baldwin
2024-03-26 12:19 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f29bb557-8e51-2bda-022f-08087af92458@FreeBSD.org \
--to=jhb@freebsd.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simark@simark.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).