From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 92674 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2017 16:45:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 92642 invoked by uid 89); 13 Dec 2017 16:45:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: smtp.polymtl.ca Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (HELO smtp.polymtl.ca) (132.207.4.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:45:31 +0000 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id vBDGjOYX011117 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:45:29 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id D07FC1E586; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:45:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from simark.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316AC1E02D; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:45:24 -0500 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:45:00 -0000 From: Simon Marchi To: Pedro Alves Cc: Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] python: Add qualified parameter to gdb.Breakpoint In-Reply-To: <2c2971c3-dd3f-1c92-4a8f-60c69aea65cf@redhat.com> References: <1512686013-24658-1-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> <18e86b00-7659-e57f-e650-fae62ebf1d2c@redhat.com> <7f59352579a659f3ee96f6a9e5404f9b@polymtl.ca> <2c2971c3-dd3f-1c92-4a8f-60c69aea65cf@redhat.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: simon.marchi@polymtl.ca User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.2 X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:45:24 +0000 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-12/txt/msg00316.txt.bz2 On 2017-12-13 08:17, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 12/08/2017 06:42 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: > >>> So we either need to clarify that in the Python bits too, >>> or some do some xref'ing. >> >> Agreed, I didn't like that wording either. I had only found the >> Linespec Locations page, which doesn't specifically say >> "fully-qualified >> name", but mentions free-function (though it's in an example, not a >> formal definition). How is this? >> >> The optional @var{qualified} argument is a boolean that allows >> interpreting >> the function passed in @code{spec} as a fully-qualified name. It is >> equivalent >> to @code{break}'s @code{-qualified} flag (@pxref{Linespec Locations} >> and >> @ref{Explicit Locations}). > > Thanks, that looks fine. > > (I thought I had replied earlier, but looks like I dreamt it.) > > Thanks, > Pedro Alves Thanks, it is now pushed. Simon