From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCE853858D37 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 19:16:38 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org CCE853858D37 Received: from pps.filterd (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 23LH5XW1002649; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 19:16:36 GMT Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3fhxh9bjx1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Apr 2022 19:16:36 +0000 Received: from m0187473.ppops.net (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 23LIqtTs022687; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 19:16:36 GMT Received: from ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (7a.29.35a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.53.41.122]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3fhxh9bjwn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Apr 2022 19:16:36 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 23LJF25U027434; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 19:16:35 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.28]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3ffneaf6fk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Apr 2022 19:16:35 +0000 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 23LJGYaE43975038 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 21 Apr 2022 19:16:34 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972C4112062; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 19:16:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC39112061; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 19:16:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-e362e14c-2378-11b2-a85c-87d605f3c641.ibm.com (unknown [9.163.11.46]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 19:16:33 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for gdb.base/solib-search.exp test. From: Carl Love To: Simon Marchi Cc: Carl Love , dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Rogerio Alves , Will Schmidt Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 12:16:33 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <8fe6f3bee129c0a3159d3ef57c942b9473255d8d.camel@us.ibm.com> <8f0ddc69-6cbd-14f6-8bb9-a3d3fb963493@simark.ca> <8c9d6b7cae96fd49cb455e6b1913b20ee8347c67.camel@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-18.el8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: i1tuU9riqgwR7mZMNmc8vjk-GfcRJm7X X-Proofpoint-GUID: hRFkaNav11F35Tz7a9GMWXjXV1Q64HrH X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.858,Hydra:6.0.486,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-04-21_04,2022-04-21_01,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=566 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2204210101 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_EF, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 19:16:40 -0000 On Thu, 2022-04-21 at 15:04 -0400, Simon Marchi wrote: > > > Cool, can you integrate the info above in your commit message? That > makes the problem clearer for somebody not in your seat. The patch > is > ok with that changed, thanks. Yup, will do. Thanks. Carl