From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91C9F3858D20 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 05:58:30 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 91C9F3858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.170] (unknown [217.28.27.60]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2CD8E1E110; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 00:58:30 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1674799110; bh=3auG2XPYe2y3NrhkkZNKrh4JeNky0cZVjc1Qna82ops=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=iuuXtXyX9U8mgTB3g+D9bSgwWJLQDMdXKOpNtxUonxSz3Q1+Gg6HwlTDMgCAV1QiN lbwUJOS/wCNs783ArpThj6QAraPgW/EBTnsdgOmspi98qQpbVee1Neh8xVGJ43TwQJ 5srQNGWNvrEFQh09o5NWIFTYdnT3LEiQDm5ww95M= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 00:58:29 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make gdb.ada/ptype_tagged_param.exp pass Content-Language: fr To: Tom Tromey , Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches References: <20230119163150.492922-1-tromey@adacore.com> <874jslyw58.fsf@tromey.com> From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: <874jslyw58.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 1/20/23 12:05, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches writes: > > Simon> Do you know what could have changed? New improved DWARF info from a > Simon> newer compiler? > > Possibly, but I don't really know, and I actually don't remember all > that much about how tagged types work under the hood. > > Simon> In any case, your change LGTM, since it will still cause a fail if we do > Simon> have debug info but see the bad output. > > Thanks, I'm going to check it in. > > Tom Woops, I hit a FAIL here. I think the $has_runtime_debug_info condition is backwards Simon