public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kevin Buettner (Code Review)" <gerrit@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [review] Avoid infinite recursion in find_pc_sect_line
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 19:40:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <gerrit.1574019611000.I595470be6ab5f61ca7e4e9e70c61a252c0deaeaa@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gerrit.1574019611000.I595470be6ab5f61ca7e4e9e70c61a252c0deaeaa@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io>

Change URL: https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/682
......................................................................

Avoid infinite recursion in find_pc_sect_line

This is a patch which has been in Fedora GDB for well over a decade.  It
was written by Jan Kratochvil, though I've made some minor changes to
the comment and warning message.

It was motivated by a customer reported bug (back in 2006!) which
showed infinite mutual recursion between find_pc_sect_line and
find_pc_line.  Here is a portion of the backtrace from the bug report:

    (gdb) bt
    #0  0x00000000004450a4 in lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc_section (
	pc=251700325328, section=0x570f500) at gdb/minsyms.c:484
    #1  0x00000000004bbfb2 in find_pc_sect_line (pc=251700325328,
	section=0x570f500, notcurrent=0) at gdb/symtab.c:2057
    #2  0x00000000004bc480 in find_pc_line (pc=251700325328, notcurrent=0)
	at gdb/symtab.c:2232
    #3  0x00000000004bc1ff in find_pc_sect_line (pc=251700325328,
	section=0x570f500, notcurrent=0) at gdb/symtab.c:2081

    ...   (lots and lots of the same two functions with the same parameters)

    #1070 0x00000000004bc480 in find_pc_line (pc=251700325328, notcurrent=0)
	at gdb/symtab.c:2232
    #1071 0x00000000004bc1ff in find_pc_sect_line (pc=251700325328,
	section=0x570f500, notcurrent=0) at gdb/symtab.c:2081
    #1072 0x00000000004bc480 in find_pc_line (pc=251700325328, notcurrent=0)
	at gdb/symtab.c:2232
    #1073 0x00000000004bc1ff in find_pc_sect_line (pc=251700325328,
	section=0x570f500, notcurrent=0) at gdb/symtab.c:2081
    #1074 0x00000000004bc480 in find_pc_line (pc=251700325328, notcurrent=0)
	at gdb/symtab.c:2232
    #1075 0x00000000004bc1ff in find_pc_sect_line (pc=251696794399,
	section=0x59b0df8, notcurrent=0) at gdb/symtab.c:2081
    #1076 0x00000000004bc480 in find_pc_line (pc=251696794399, notcurrent=0)
	at gdb/symtab.c:2232
    #1077 0x000000000055550e in find_frame_sal (frame=0xb3f3e0, sal=0x7fff1d1a8200)
	at gdb/frame.c:1392
    #1078 0x00000000004d86fd in set_current_sal_from_frame (frame=0x1648, center=1)
	at gdb/stack.c:379
    #1079 0x00000000004cf137 in normal_stop () at gdb/infrun.c:3147
    ...

The test case was a large application.  Attempts were made to make a
small(er) test case, but those attempts were not successful.
Therefore, I cannot provide a new test for this patch.

That said, we ought to guard against recursively calling
find_pc_sect_line (via find_pc_line) with the identical PC value that
it had been called with.  Should this happen, infinite recursion (as
shown in the above backtrace) is the result.  This patch prevents
that from happening.

Also, it seems likely that if this case should happen, there is a bug
somewhere, possibly in the C library or in some other part of the
toolchain, so we print a warning message asking the user to file a bug
report.  We don't error out here because falling through may produce
a satisfactory result.

I spent some time looking at the surrounding code and commentary which
handle the case of PC being in a stub/trampoline.  It first appeared
in the public GDB repository in April, 1999.  The ChangeLog entry for
this commit is from 1998-12-31.  The relevant portion is:

	(find_pc_sect_line): Return correct information if pc is in import
	or export stub (trampoline).

What's remarkable about the overall ChangeLog entry is that it's over
2500+ lines long!  I believe that this was part of the infamous "HP
merge" (in which insufficient due diligence was given in accepting
a large batch of changes from an outside source).  In the years that
followed, much of this code was either significantly revised or
outright removed.

For this particular case, I'm grateful that extensive comments were
provided by "RT".  (I haven't been able to figure out who RT is/was.)
I've decided against attempting to revise this stub/trampoline handling
code any further than adding Jan's test which prevents an obvious case
of infinite recursion.

I've tested on Fedora 31, x86-64.  I see no regressions.  I've also
searched the logfile for the new message, but as expected, no message
was found (which is good).

gdb/ChangeLog:

	* symtab.c (find_pc_sect_line): Add check which prevents infinite
	recursion.

Change-Id: I595470be6ab5f61ca7e4e9e70c61a252c0deaeaa
---
M gdb/symtab.c
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)



diff --git a/gdb/symtab.c b/gdb/symtab.c
index 0064800..8a01317 100644
--- a/gdb/symtab.c
+++ b/gdb/symtab.c
@@ -3142,6 +3142,16 @@
 	     SYMBOL_LINKAGE_NAME (msymbol)); */
 	  ;
 	/* fall through */
+	else if (BMSYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (mfunsym) == pc)
+	  {
+	    /* Avoid infinite (mutual) recursion between
+	       find_pc_sect_line and find_pc_line.  */
+	    warning ("Could not dereference stub/trampoline %s (0x%s).  "
+	             "Please file a bug report.",
+	             MSYMBOL_LINKAGE_NAME (msymbol.minsym),
+		     paddress(target_gdbarch (), pc));
+	    /* Fall through.  */
+	  }
 	else
 	  return find_pc_line (BMSYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (mfunsym), 0);
       }

-- 
Gerrit-Project: binutils-gdb
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I595470be6ab5f61ca7e4e9e70c61a252c0deaeaa
Gerrit-Change-Number: 682
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange

       reply	other threads:[~2019-11-17 19:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-17 19:40 Kevin Buettner (Code Review) [this message]
2019-11-27  2:19 ` Luis Machado (Code Review)
2019-11-27 20:13 ` Kevin Buettner (Code Review)
2019-11-27 23:00 ` Simon Marchi (Code Review)
2019-12-04 22:04 ` Kevin Buettner (Code Review)
2020-03-12  5:59 ` [pushed] " Sourceware to Gerrit sync (Code Review)
2020-03-12  5:59 ` Sourceware to Gerrit sync (Code Review)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=gerrit.1574019611000.I595470be6ab5f61ca7e4e9e70c61a252c0deaeaa@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io \
    --to=gerrit@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).