From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1151 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2012 19:45:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 1141 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jan 2012 19:45:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:45:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0OJjRfO013549 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:45:27 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0OJjQdr025603; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:45:26 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0OJjNxl003569; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:45:24 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, vladimir@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: dead code in varobj.c:c_value_of_variable ? References: <20120109080759.GL3782@adacore.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:53:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120109080759.GL3782@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:07:59 +0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00844.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: [...] Joel> And therefore, it seems to me that the following code in Joel> c_value_of_variable is dead: I think your analysis is correct. Tom