From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14946 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2010 20:25:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 14935 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Nov 2010 20:25:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:25:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA1KPEVE030581 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:25:14 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA1KPEkj019556; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:25:14 -0400 Received: from parfait.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA1KPDK0031819; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:25:13 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: dje@google.com (Doug Evans) Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] New function finish_python_initialization References: <20101101022638.812792461AF@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:25:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20101101022638.812792461AF@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> (Doug Evans's message of "Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:26:38 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> This patch fixes things by moving the evaluation of the init Doug> python script to after most of the gdb initialization. That way Doug> the python script can punt on further such issues. Doug> I will check this in in two days if there are no objections. It looks ok to me. Tom