From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22413 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2010 18:06:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 22400 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2010 18:06:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:06:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KI69vL015981 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:06:09 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KI685Q014915; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:06:08 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KI67uV026099; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:06:07 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 16BC037979C; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:06:07 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: msnyder@vmware.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] target record_core -> target record-core? References: <20100419064717.75D476E3DC@sebabeach.org> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:06:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20100419064717.75D476E3DC@sebabeach.org> (Doug Evans's message of "Sun, 18 Apr 2010 23:47:17 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00621.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> I realize this is a nit but is it possible to rename Doug> target record_core to target record-core? Doug> Or is it too late ... Thanks for catching this. Doug> All other targets (that I know of) use dashes in shortname, and having Doug> to remember which use dashes and which use underscores is, umm, blechy. Additionally, I prefer dashes because they are simpler to type. I think we can retroactively fix mistakes here by adding deprecated aliases. One more thing I've wanted is also making it so deprecated commands don't show up in completion when there is a non-deprecated completion available. Any comments on that? Tom