From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21644 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2010 17:12:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 21636 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Apr 2010 17:12:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:12:37 +0000 Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o38HBPGO012073 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:12:01 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o38HAnUK016127; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:10:50 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o38HAm5d026811; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:10:49 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 45F5137983B; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:10:48 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Sami Wagiaalla Cc: Sami Wagiaalla , GDB Patches Subject: Re: [patch] Backport memory leak fix to 7.1 References: <4BA8E6DC.7020701@redhat.com> <1270742520.2387.2.camel@localhost> Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:12:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1270742520.2387.2.camel@localhost> (Sami Wagiaalla's message of "Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:02:00 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00179.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Sami" == Sami Wagiaalla writes: Sami> Is this okay to go into the gdb_7_1-branch ? Yes, thanks. Tom