From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1056 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2014 16:29:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 1016 invoked by uid 89); 2 Feb 2014 16:29:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 16:29:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s12GT41J013540 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 2 Feb 2014 11:29:05 -0500 Received: from psique (ovpn-113-91.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.91]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s12GT1Hw030451 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 2 Feb 2014 11:29:03 -0500 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR tdep/16397: SystemTap SDT probe support for x86 doesn't work with "triplet operands" References: <201401301535.s0UFZp3N013895@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 16:29:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201401301535.s0UFZp3N013895@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (Mark Kettenis's message of "Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:35:51 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 On Thursday, January 30 2014, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> From: Sergio Durigan Junior >> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:16:15 -0200 >> >> On Friday, January 17 2014, I wrote: >> >> > On Sunday, January 12 2014, I wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> This is the continuation of what Joel proposed on: >> >> >> >> >> > >> > Ping. >> >> Ping^2. > > No objection to this going in (other than the unsafe use of > isdigit(3)) Could you be more specific about the unsafe use of isdigit? Thanks for the approval, -- Sergio