From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2805 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2014 17:31:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 2791 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jan 2014 17:31:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:31:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0AHUxvS005391 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:31:00 -0500 Received: from psique (ovpn-113-176.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.176]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0AHUucZ011823 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:30:58 -0500 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Pedro Alves Cc: Yao Qi , GDB Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix gdb.trace/mi-traceframe-changed.exp to check for target trace support References: <52CF4B40.3030500@codesourcery.com> <52CF57CF.9030503@codesourcery.com> <52CFD221.3050100@redhat.com> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:31:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <52CFD221.3050100@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:57:37 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00291.txt.bz2 On Friday, January 10 2014, Pedro Alves wrote: >>> The root cause is that tfile.c isn't portable and unable to produce >>> trace file properly for s390x. Search FIXME in it. >> >> Indeed, thanks for pointing that. > > Is it the register block size? What's the actual error that > causes / you're seeing? The error is: -trace-find frame-number 0^M &"PC not available\n"^M ^done,found="1",tracepoint="1",traceframe="0",frame={level="-1",addr="",func="??",args=[]}^M (gdb) ^M FAIL: gdb.trace/mi-traceframe-changed.exp: tfile: -trace-find frame-number 0 There is also another error before, but it was already failing for 7.6.2. -- Sergio