From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27184 invoked by alias); 19 May 2011 18:38:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 27176 invoked by uid 22791); 19 May 2011 18:38:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:37:54 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4JIbp53017321 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 19 May 2011 14:37:51 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4JIbpAx005536; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:37:51 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4JIbo7d007981; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:37:51 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 4FB9537918A; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:37:49 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Marc Khouzam Cc: "'sami wagiaalla'" , "'gdb-patches\@sourceware.org'" Subject: Re: Patch for non-stop remote assertion References: <4D4C62FA.5080101@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 18:38:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Marc Khouzam's message of "Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:31:01 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00453.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Marc" == Marc Khouzam writes: Sorry about the long delay on this. Marc> I noticed a third use of get_current_arch () in that file, Marc> within method python_on_normal_stop (). Should that one be Marc> changed also? I think that one is ok. Marc> How do you want to move forward with this? I am going to check it in now. Tom