From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5253 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2011 14:52:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 5229 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Dec 2011 14:52:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:52:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBKEpu09011925 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:51:56 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBKEpuib018536; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:51:56 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBKEpsUR001097; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:51:54 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb.ada/catch_ex.exp, gdb.ada/mi_catch_ex.exp and unsupported catchpoints References: <201112061718.50031.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201112091800.02236.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201112101926.40691.pedro@codesourcery.com> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:53:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201112101926.40691.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Sat, 10 Dec 2011 19:26:40 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00662.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> Here's a start. I didn't really try to confirm if I was extracting the Pedro> arguments correctly for any other function bug the Ada runtime's Pedro> function in question, but at least it works in the case we're Pedro> interested in. :-) I think it looks pretty good. If you put this in, I will look at making the next-over-throw code use it. Pedro> + /* The FULL_NAME pointer is at offset 8 of the object pointed by Pedro> + E. */ Pedro> + full_name_val = value_at (void_ptr_type, e + 8); 8 seems wrong on 32 bit. Now, of course, we need struct layout code... :-) Tom