From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15508 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2011 14:58:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 15498 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2011 14:58:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:58:10 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5TEw8DB021441 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:58:08 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5TEw7vx030032; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:58:07 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5TEw6Fp027814; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:58:06 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: GDB Subject: Re: PATCH: PR testsuite/12040: GDB Fortran tests use g77 instead of gfortran References: <20100920135856.GA27953@intel.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:58:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (H. J. Lu's message of "Wed, 29 Jun 2011 07:51:29 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00449.txt.bz2 >>>>> "H.J." == H J Lu writes: H.J.> Did we get gfortran when searching for F77/f77 compiler? No, I forgot the most crucial bit :) I will write a follow-up patch to make our tests use gfortran. I don't think supporting g77 is all that worthwhile any more. Tom