From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement new `info core mappings' command
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3hb2u8gkp.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1RJK0U-0003hX-AT@fencepost.gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 27 Oct 2011 03:04:06 -0400")
Hello Eli,
Thanks for the review.
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
>> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:07:45 -0200
>> + while (argv != NULL && *argv != NULL)
>> + {
>> + if (strncmp (argv[0], "mappings", strlen (argv[0])) == 0)
>> + {
>> + mappings_f = 1;
>> + }
>> + else if (strncmp (argv[0], "all", strlen (argv[0])) == 0)
>> + {
>> + all = 1;
>> + }
>> + argv++;
>> + }
>
> What is this "all" stuff about?
Removed. Since it only has 1 valid command (`mappings'), you're right,
we don't need the `all'.
>> +@cindex core dump file
>
> This index entry is too general, it sounds like this section describes
> everything about core dump files that GDB supports. Better qualify
> it, e.g.
>
> @cindex core dump file, list mapped memory
Ok, I did my best to rewrite the @cindex using better sentences. Hope
it's good now.
>> One thing I am not sure is where to put the entry for this command on
>> the documentation. I decided to put it below `info proc', but I'd be
>> glad if you could give your opinions.
>
> I don't think it's good to put it in the same section as "info proc",
> because we say at the beginning of the section
>
> Many versions of SVR4 and compatible systems provide a facility called
> @samp{/proc} that can be used to examine the image of a running
> process using file-system subroutines.
>
> But this new command has nothing to do with /proc, and does not need
> /proc support to work, right?
>
> If /proc is indeed irrelevant, then I'd prefer a separate @subsection
> alongside this one. You'd need to add some short explanation of the
> background and use case(s) for this command, but having that is a good
> idea anyway: as written now, this command lands on the reader out of
> the blue, more or less.
Ok, thanks for the directions. I rewrote this part of the patch (see
below) to address all the comments. Please, let me know what you think.
Thank you,
Sergio.
diff --git a/gdb/NEWS b/gdb/NEWS
index 5cdb63e..d04fbe6 100644
--- a/gdb/NEWS
+++ b/gdb/NEWS
@@ -3,6 +3,9 @@
*** Changes since GDB 7.3.1
+* GDB has a new `info core mappings' command. It displays the memory
+ regions in a corefile, similar to `info proc mappings' command.
+
* GDB has two new commands: "set remote hardware-watchpoint-length-limit"
and "show remote hardware-watchpoint-length-limit". These allows to
set or show the maximum length limit (in bytes) of a remote
diff --git a/gdb/corefile.c b/gdb/corefile.c
index ce3b755..3f147f8 100644
--- a/gdb/corefile.c
+++ b/gdb/corefile.c
@@ -24,17 +24,23 @@
#include <errno.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
+#include <ctype.h>
#include "inferior.h"
#include "symtab.h"
+#include "gdbarch.h"
+#include "arch-utils.h"
#include "command.h"
#include "gdbcmd.h"
#include "bfd.h"
+#include "elf-bfd.h"
+#include "elf/internal.h"
#include "target.h"
#include "gdbcore.h"
#include "dis-asm.h"
#include "gdb_stat.h"
#include "completer.h"
#include "exceptions.h"
+#include "objfiles.h"
/* Local function declarations. */
@@ -83,6 +89,185 @@ core_file_command (char *filename, int from_tty)
}
\f
+/* Helper function for `print_core_map'. It is used to iterate
+ over the corefile's sections and print proper information about
+ memory-mappings.
+
+ BFD is the bfd used to get the sections.
+ SECT is the current section being "visited".
+ OBJ is not used. */
+
+static void
+print_proc_map_iter (bfd *bfd, asection *sect, void *obj)
+{
+ /* We're interested in matching sections' names beginning with
+ `load', because they are the sections containing information
+ about the process' memory regions. */
+ static const char *proc_map_match = "load";
+ int proc_map_match_size = strlen (proc_map_match);
+ /* Flag to indicate whether we have found something. */
+ int found = 0;
+ /* The section's size. */
+ bfd_size_type secsize;
+ /* We have to know the bitness of this architecture. */
+ int bitness;
+ /* We'll use these later. They are basically used for iterating
+ over every objfile in the system so that we can find needed
+ information about the memory region being examinated. */
+ struct obj_section *s = NULL;
+ struct objfile *objfile = NULL;
+ /* Fields to be printed for the proc map. */
+ unsigned long start = 0, end = 0;
+ unsigned int size = 0;
+ char *filename = NULL;
+
+ if (strncmp (proc_map_match, sect->name, proc_map_match_size) != 0)
+ /* This section is not useful. */
+ return;
+
+ bitness = gdbarch_addr_bit (gdbarch_from_bfd (bfd));
+
+ /* Unfortunately, some sections in the corefile don't have any
+ content inside. This is bad because we need to print, among
+ other things, its final address in the memory (which is
+ impossible to know if we don't have a size). That's why we
+ first need to check if the section's got anything inside it. */
+ secsize = bfd_section_size (bfd, sect);
+
+ if (secsize == 0)
+ {
+ /* Ok, the section is empty. In this case, we must look inside
+ ELF's Program Header, because (at least) there we have
+ information about the section's size. That's what we're doing
+ here. */
+ Elf_Internal_Phdr *p = elf_tdata (bfd)->phdr;
+ if (p != NULL)
+ {
+ int i;
+ unsigned int n = elf_elfheader (bfd)->e_phnum;
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++, p++)
+ /* For each entry in the Program Header, we have to
+ check if the section's initial address is equal to
+ the entry's virtual address. If it is, then we
+ have just found the section's entry in the Program
+ Header, and can use the entry's information to
+ complete missing data from the section. */
+ if (sect->vma == p->p_vaddr)
+ {
+ found = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (found)
+ secsize = p->p_memsz;
+ }
+ }
+
+ size = secsize;
+ start = sect->vma;
+ end = (unsigned long) (sect->vma + size);
+
+ /* Now begins a new part of the work. We still don't have complete
+ information about the memory region. For example, we still need
+ to know the filename which is represented by the region. Such
+ info can be gathered from the objfile's data structure, and for
+ that we must iterate over all the objsections and check if the
+ objsection's initial address is inside the section we have at hand.
+ If it is, then we can use this specific objsection to obtain the
+ missing data. */
+ found = 0;
+ ALL_OBJSECTIONS (objfile, s)
+ if (obj_section_addr (s) >= start
+ && obj_section_addr (s) <= end)
+ {
+ found = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (found)
+ filename = s->objfile->name;
+
+ if (bitness == 32)
+ printf_filtered ("\t%#10lx %#10lx %#10x %7s\n",
+ start,
+ end,
+ (int) size,
+ filename ? filename : "");
+ else
+ printf_filtered (" %#18lx %#18lx %#10x %7s\n",
+ start,
+ end,
+ (int) size,
+ filename ? filename : "");
+}
+
+/* Implements the `info proc map' command when the user has provided
+ a corefile. */
+
+static void
+print_core_map (void)
+{
+ const char *exe;
+ int bitness;
+
+ gdb_assert (core_bfd != NULL);
+
+ bitness = gdbarch_addr_bit (gdbarch_from_bfd (core_bfd));
+
+ /* Getting the executable name. */
+ exe = bfd_core_file_failing_command (core_bfd);
+
+ printf_filtered (_("exe = '%s'\n"), exe);
+ printf_filtered (_("Mapped address spaces:\n\n"));
+ if (bitness == 32)
+ printf_filtered ("\t%10s %10s %10s %7s\n",
+ "Start Addr",
+ " End Addr",
+ " Size", "objfile");
+ else
+ printf_filtered (" %18s %18s %10s %7s\n",
+ "Start Addr",
+ " End Addr",
+ " Size", "objfile");
+
+ bfd_map_over_sections (core_bfd,
+ print_proc_map_iter,
+ NULL);
+}
+
+/* Implement the `info core' command. */
+
+static void
+info_core_cmd (char *args, int from_tty)
+{
+ char **argv = NULL;
+ int mappings_f = 0;
+ struct cleanup *c = NULL;
+
+ if (!core_bfd)
+ error (_("You are not using a corefile at the moment."));
+
+ if (args)
+ {
+ /* Break up 'args' into an argv array. */
+ argv = gdb_buildargv (args);
+ c = make_cleanup_freeargv (argv);
+ }
+ while (argv != NULL && *argv != NULL)
+ {
+ if (strncmp (argv[0], "mappings", strlen (argv[0])) == 0)
+ {
+ mappings_f = 1;
+ }
+ argv++;
+ }
+
+ if (mappings_f)
+ print_core_map ();
+
+ if (c)
+ do_cleanups (c);
+}
+
/* If there are two or more functions that wish to hook into
exec_file_command, this function will call all of the hook
functions. */
@@ -450,6 +635,11 @@ _initialize_core (void)
{
struct cmd_list_element *c;
+ add_info ("core", info_core_cmd, _("\
+Show information about a corefile.\n\
+Specify any of the following keywords for detailed info:\n\
+ mappings -- list of mapped memory regions."));
+
c = add_cmd ("core-file", class_files, core_file_command, _("\
Use FILE as core dump for examining memory and registers.\n\
No arg means have no core file. This command has been superseded by the\n\
diff --git a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
index 3e78832..427811e 100644
--- a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
+++ b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
@@ -17713,6 +17713,56 @@ processes and all the threads within each process.
For QNX Neutrino only, this command displays the list of all mapinfos.
@end table
+@node Process Information from Core Dump File
+@subsection Process Information from Core Dump File
+@cindex examine core dump file process information
+@cindex process info via core dump file
+
+If your system supports the generation of core dump files (core files), you
+can use them to obtain information about processes. For that, you can use
+the command @code{info core} inside @value{GDBN} to report information like
+the memory mappings of the process when the core dump was generated.
+@code{info core} works only on systems that support core dump files, and only
+when you are using a core dump file inside @value{GDBN}.
+
+@xref{Core File Generation}, for information on how to generate core dump
+files inside @value{GDBN}. @xref{Files}, for information on invoking
+@value{GDBN} in the post-mortem debugging mode.
+
+@table @code
+@kindex info core
+@cindex core dump file, process information
+@item info core
+@itemx info core mappings
+@cindex memory address space mappings inside a core dump file
+Report the memory address ranges accessible in the core dump file. Assuming
+you have a core dump file and it is loaded into @value{GDBN}, the output of
+the command will be similar to:
+
+@smallexample
+(@value{GDBP}) info core mappings
+exe = '/tmp/a.out'
+Mapped address spaces:
+
+ Start Addr End Addr Size objfile
+ 0x400000 0x401000 0x1000 /tmp/a.out
+ 0x600000 0x601000 0x1000 /tmp/a.out
+ 0x397de00000 0x397de1f000 0x1f000 /usr/lib/debug/lib64/ld-2.13.so.debug
+ 0x397e01e000 0x397e01f000 0x1000 /usr/lib/debug/lib64/ld-2.13.so.debug
+ 0x397e01f000 0x397e020000 0x1000 /usr/lib/debug/lib64/ld-2.13.so.debug
+ 0x397e020000 0x397e021000 0x1000 /usr/lib/debug/lib64/ld-2.13.so.debug
+ 0x397e200000 0x397e391000 0x191000 /usr/lib/debug/lib64/libc-2.13.so.debug
+ 0x397e591000 0x397e595000 0x4000 /usr/lib/debug/lib64/libc-2.13.so.debug
+ 0x397e595000 0x397e596000 0x1000 /usr/lib/debug/lib64/libc-2.13.so.debug
+ 0x397e596000 0x397e59c000 0x6000
+ 0x7ffff7fd1000 0x7ffff7fd4000 0x3000
+ 0x7ffff7ffd000 0x7ffff7ffe000 0x1000
+ 0x7ffff7ffe000 0x7ffff7fff000 0x1000 system-supplied DSO at 0x7ffff7ffe000
+ 0x7ffffffde000 0x7ffffffff000 0x21000
+ 0xffffffffff600000 0xffffffffff601000 0x1000
+@end smallexample
+@end table
+
@node DJGPP Native
@subsection Features for Debugging @sc{djgpp} Programs
@cindex @sc{djgpp} debugging
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/corefile.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/corefile.exp
index 5b0cdf1..190281c 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/corefile.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/corefile.exp
@@ -171,6 +171,13 @@ gdb_test_multiple "x/8bd buf2" "$test" {
}
}
+# Test the `info core mapping' command.
+set ws "\[ \t\]+"
+set test "test info core mapping"
+gdb_test "info core mapping" \
+ ".*Mapped address spaces:.*${hex}${ws}${hex}${ws}${hex}.*" \
+ $test
+
# test reinit_frame_cache
gdb_load ${binfile}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-27 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-26 21:08 Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-10-26 21:25 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-10-27 7:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-27 18:09 ` Sergio Durigan Junior [this message]
2011-10-29 19:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-31 0:34 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-31 7:00 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-10-31 8:13 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-31 12:57 ` Pedro Alves
2011-11-01 11:54 ` [patch] `info proc ' completion [Re: [PATCH] Implement new `info core mappings' command] Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-01 16:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-03 14:12 ` [patch] `info proc *' help fix [Re: [patch] `info proc ' completion] Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-03 16:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-03 17:07 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-03 18:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-03 18:25 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-02 18:30 ` [patch] `info proc ' completion [Re: [PATCH] Implement new `info core mappings' command] Pedro Alves
2011-11-02 18:48 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-03 20:01 ` [PATCH] Implement new `info core mappings' command Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-11-04 10:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-04 16:27 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-08 1:49 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-11-08 21:47 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-09 20:32 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-16 4:10 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-11-21 16:15 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-11-23 16:32 ` [rfc] Options for "info mappings" etc. (Re: [PATCH] Implement new `info core mappings' command) Ulrich Weigand
2011-11-23 23:37 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-12-01 19:51 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-12-05 12:59 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-05 15:02 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-12-06 16:01 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-06 17:19 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-12-07 16:29 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-07 17:24 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-07 20:14 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-12-09 13:28 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-09 14:10 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-20 23:08 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-12-21 22:36 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-22 16:15 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-05 16:02 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-05 18:03 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-05 18:20 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-05 19:54 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-06 6:41 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-01-06 12:29 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-06 12:27 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-09 15:44 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-11 16:38 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-11 18:32 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-05 18:37 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-01-05 19:35 ` Ulrich Weigand
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-06 3:28 [PATCH 0/4 v2] Implement support for SystemTap probes on userspace Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-06 3:32 ` [PATCH 1/4 v2] Refactor internal variable mechanism Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-06 3:36 ` [PATCH 2/4 v2] Implement new features needed for handling SystemTap probes Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-11 19:06 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-04-11 22:14 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-11 23:33 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-04-06 3:37 ` [PATCH 4/4 v2] Documentation and testsuite changes Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-06 9:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-09 21:37 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-06 4:11 ` [PATCH 3/4 v2] Use longjmp and exception probes when available Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-04 3:09 [PATCH 4/6] Implement support for SystemTap probes Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-04 19:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-06 20:20 ` Tom Tromey
2011-04-06 20:52 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-07 2:41 ` Yao Qi
2011-04-07 3:32 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-07 17:04 ` Tom Tromey
2011-04-11 3:21 ` Yao Qi
2011-04-08 12:38 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-11 3:52 ` Yao Qi
2011-08-12 15:45 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-08-12 17:22 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2011-08-12 21:33 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-19 16:42 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-07 19:36 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-07 19:54 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-05-07 19:58 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-07 20:26 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-05-07 20:38 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-08 1:36 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3hb2u8gkp.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=sergiodj@redhat.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).