From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1397 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2010 20:14:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 1385 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jul 2010 20:14:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:14:06 +0000 Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6TKDhEg013252 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:13:43 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6TKDgHN006080; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:13:42 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6TKDfhO032742; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:13:42 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 233E23797F9; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:13:40 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Jan Kratochvil , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Fix regression on prelinked executables References: <20100715095457.GA22922@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20100729163648.GA13267@adacore.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:14:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20100729163648.GA13267@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:36:48 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00553.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> I'm not sure about putting it on the 7.2 branch, however. Given that Joel> this can directly affect Darwin, I'd rather give this patch an observation Joel> period and potentially put it in 7.2.1. This is fine by me -- but AFAIK Darwin is pretty broken already. At least, there is an open bug with what looks to be a simple crasher. Tom